2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XRF core scanning yields reliable semiquantitative data on the elemental composition of highly organic-rich sediments: Evidence from the Füramoos peat bog (Southern Germany)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of the method depends on factors related to: the amount of energy needed to excite electrons; the amount of X-ray emission; the atomic number of the element under study. 27 The analysis was performed on the Spectron-Optel RMA WD-XRF spectrometer with 46Pd anode ( Figure 6). The quantitative analysis of metals in the peat ash was carried out using certified standards.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sensitivity of the method depends on factors related to: the amount of energy needed to excite electrons; the amount of X-ray emission; the atomic number of the element under study. 27 The analysis was performed on the Spectron-Optel RMA WD-XRF spectrometer with 46Pd anode ( Figure 6). The quantitative analysis of metals in the peat ash was carried out using certified standards.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative analysis of metals in the peat ash was carried out using certified standards. 27,28 Figure 6. Spectron-Optel RMA WD-XRF spectrometer (photo: B. Igliński)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three parallel drillcores (FU1, FU3, and FU4) were recovered using a Wacker Neuson DH-65 drill hammer at 47°59′32.5 N, 9°53′13.9 E during a drilling campaign in 2017 [7] . All cores were drilled within a horizontal distance of <1.5 m and were subsequently correlated using lithological marker horizons and well-defined changes in the palynological dataset.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned XRF-based techniques are now part of a routine analytical geochemistry toolbox and, since the introduction of XRF-CS, numerous studies have discussed the advantages and pitfalls of these techniques in comparison to spectrometry methods applied to a range of natural archives, e.g., marine [37] and lacustrine sediments [38], speleothems [39] and peat records [25,26,40]. In addition, there have been several attempts to calibrate the most recent XRF scanning methods against more conventional analytical techniques (i.e., ICP) and to convert semi-quantitative data (XRF-based) into quantitative data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper compares the results of geochemical measurements applied to sediment samples from karst Lake Ighiel, in the Romanian Carpathians (SE Europe), which enable a comparison of the three geochemical methods applied-XRF-CS (ITRAX), FPXRF and ICP-OES. Although comparisons between different methods, e.g., bulk and high-resolution point analyses, e.g., [25,26,38,40], were carried out previously, none of them specifically explored the relationship between XRF-CS, FPXRF and ICP-OES data obtained from a karstic sediment record. To ensure high data reproducibility, the analysis focused on assessing the patterns in a set of lithogenic indicators, Ti, K, Ca, Fe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%