2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2004.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XRD analysis of carbon stacking structure in coal during heat treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
166
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 370 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
11
166
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…d002 values of carbon foams obtained for 22-25 ° varied in the range of 0.3545-0.3936 nm (Table 3). These values are greater than the value of graphite (0.3350 nm), which refers to nongraphitized carbon structure of synthesized foams [1,21,22]. d002 values decreased with rising the temperature from 400 °C to 800 °C.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…d002 values of carbon foams obtained for 22-25 ° varied in the range of 0.3545-0.3936 nm (Table 3). These values are greater than the value of graphite (0.3350 nm), which refers to nongraphitized carbon structure of synthesized foams [1,21,22]. d002 values decreased with rising the temperature from 400 °C to 800 °C.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…From Fig. 2, the peaks at 2h = 20°-30°referred to the stacking structure of aromatic layers (graphite 002), and the broadening originated from the small dimensions of crystallites perpendicular to aromatic layers (Takagi et al 2004). Sharp and non-labeled peaks in PC indicated miscellaneous inorganic components.…”
Section: Xrd Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…After treatment with HNO 3 , the peak for the (002) plane of sample 2 and 3 slightly shifted to higher degree compared with raw coal sample (sample 1), and gradually approached the (002) plane of graphite at 26.6°, but the peak width and height showed a significant difference, i.e., the peak of sample 2 which was only treated at 25°C became wider and shorter while the peak of sample 3 which was treated with HNO 3 under reflux became narrower and higher. The results reveal that HNO 3 treatment under reflux condition can not only lower the ash content in the coal structure but also reduce the content of aliphatic structure, thereby increasing the relative content of polycyclic aromatic rings (Taylor and Bell 1980;Takagi et al 2004). The XRD results are consistent with the FT-IR results, which may be attributed to the partial breakdown of the aliphatic chains linking the aromatic units by HNO 3 under reflux condition.…”
Section: Properties Of Depolymerized Coal Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%