2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XRCC1 protects cells from chromate-induced chromosome damage, but does not affect cytotoxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data suggest that medaka cells may also predict the genotoxic response of human cells. By contrast, our medaka data differ from previous reports of Cr(VI) genotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells as 1 μM sodium chromate for 24 h damaged 8% of metaphases in CHO cells (Grlickova-Duzevik et al, 2006.). This observation is interesting, as CHO cells are currently used as a standard tool by regulatory agencies to predict human response.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These data suggest that medaka cells may also predict the genotoxic response of human cells. By contrast, our medaka data differ from previous reports of Cr(VI) genotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells as 1 μM sodium chromate for 24 h damaged 8% of metaphases in CHO cells (Grlickova-Duzevik et al, 2006.). This observation is interesting, as CHO cells are currently used as a standard tool by regulatory agencies to predict human response.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The work by Sugden et al (7,8) has demonstrated that, in addition to guanine, 8-oxoguanine is further oxidized by a Cr(V)-containing compound. Interestingly, EM9 CHO cells (X-ray cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) deficient) are hypersensitive toward clastogenesis by particulate lead chromate, a particulate form of Cr(VI) (38). Because XRCC1 is involved in the resolution of DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs), which are generated by Cr(VI) exposure (39), our results collectively suggest that SSBs, but not Cr(VI)-induced base damage, are preclastogenic lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Determination of chromosomal damage was measured as previously described [32][33]. Briefly, logarithmically growing cells were treated with lead chromate for 24 h. Cells were then harvested, resuspended in hypotonic solution and fixed with Carnoy's fixative, dropped onto slides, stained with Giemsa, and cover slips were added.…”
Section: Chromosome Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, logarithmically growing cells were treated with lead chromate for 24 h. Cells were then harvested, resuspended in hypotonic solution and fixed with Carnoy's fixative, dropped onto slides, stained with Giemsa, and cover slips were added. Background damage levels were subtracted from each data point as previously described [32][33]. Chromosomes were analyzed using our published methods [8].…”
Section: Chromosome Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%