1970
DOI: 10.1097/00006254-197011000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Xq- TURNERʼS SYNDROME

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FERGUSON-SMITH (1965) concluded that girls with deletion long arm X had fewer Turner signs than those with 45,X or deletion short arm X. and he suggested that the reason is that Xp -is responsible for the somatic features of Turner's syndrome. HECHT et al (1970) made a comparison between five cases of Xpand five of Xq -and a large group of 45,X cases and found no remarkable differences. SIMPSON et al (1971) made a survey of eight cases with dkl(Xp) in all cells and found the usual amount of Turner signs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…FERGUSON-SMITH (1965) concluded that girls with deletion long arm X had fewer Turner signs than those with 45,X or deletion short arm X. and he suggested that the reason is that Xp -is responsible for the somatic features of Turner's syndrome. HECHT et al (1970) made a comparison between five cases of Xpand five of Xq -and a large group of 45,X cases and found no remarkable differences. SIMPSON et al (1971) made a survey of eight cases with dkl(Xp) in all cells and found the usual amount of Turner signs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%