1990
DOI: 10.1002/sia.740150304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XPS study of the Y/SiOx interface at room temperature

Abstract: The reducing reaction of vapour-deposited yttrium layers on silicon oxide was measured by XPS at room temperature. The redox reaction was confined essentially to the deposition period. The thickness of the insulating SiO, layer decreiases by -0.203 om. No further reaction during the 8 h following deposition could be observed. INTRODUCTIO VThis paper deals with yttrium metal/silicon oxide/Si structures used as solar cells.' Yttrium is a very reactive metal and forms Y,O, in the presence of oxygen.' In air, yttr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical shifts of the Y component are apparent at 157.2 eV for both Pt–YO x /C(A):6:2 and Pt–YO x /C(A):5:5. Based on these findings, most of the Y component exists as a strongly oxidized Y 2 O 3 layer, and there is little component attributable to Pt 3 Y. The Pt/Y atomic ratio of the surface was estimated as 86:14 for Pt–YO x /C(A):6:2 and 66:34 for Pt–YO x /C(A):5:5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Chemical shifts of the Y component are apparent at 157.2 eV for both Pt–YO x /C(A):6:2 and Pt–YO x /C(A):5:5. Based on these findings, most of the Y component exists as a strongly oxidized Y 2 O 3 layer, and there is little component attributable to Pt 3 Y. The Pt/Y atomic ratio of the surface was estimated as 86:14 for Pt–YO x /C(A):6:2 and 66:34 for Pt–YO x /C(A):5:5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The binding energy scale was further calibrated by setting the F 1s peak to 690.0 eV. This results in a Si 2p peak at 103.2 eV when present, well within the range for SiO 2 and silicon‐supported SiO 2 films . The carbon peak is not used directly because the multiple contributions of the Nafion ® film produce slight shifts in this peak.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent excessive charging, a charge neutralizer was used. The binding energy scale was further calibrated by setting the Si 2p peak to 103.4 eV. , This value is well within the range for SiO 2 and silicon-supported SiO 2 films [103–104 eV from ref ] and results in an adventitious carbon peak at ∼284.8 eV. The carbon peak is not used directly because the multiple contributions of the Nafion film produce slight shifts in this peak.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%