2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3093(01)01120-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XPS studies of Cu incorporation in arsenic chalcogenides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7) also demonstrate noticeably less quantities of oxidized As and Fe species on the leached surfaces than on the surfaces treated electrochemically, whereas the proportion of polysulfide and the surface depletion in As and Fe are greater, especially in the case of ferric chloride solution. The formation of realgar, As 4 S 4 , which would exhibit an As 3d peak at 43.1-43.4 eV and S 2p peak at 162.8-163.1 eV (Pratt and Nesbitt, 2000;Bullen et al, 2003), or orpiment, As 2 S 3 , having the relevant BE of 43.4-43.8 and 162.5-162.7 eV, respectively (Costa et al, 2002;Gheorghiu-de La Rocque et al, 2002), should not be ruled out but seems unlikely (Mikhlin and Tomashevich, 2005). It is worth noting that only 1 min exposure to a ferric nitrate solution results in the surface entirely coated with products (EA-1-3), which mainly consist of Fe(III), As(V), and oxysulfur anions with S atoms in the oxidation states from +2 to +6, according to AFM, XPS, FTIR (not shown in figures) and XANES data (Mikhlin and Tomashevich, 2005).…”
Section: Surfaces Oxidized In Acidic Ferric Iron Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) also demonstrate noticeably less quantities of oxidized As and Fe species on the leached surfaces than on the surfaces treated electrochemically, whereas the proportion of polysulfide and the surface depletion in As and Fe are greater, especially in the case of ferric chloride solution. The formation of realgar, As 4 S 4 , which would exhibit an As 3d peak at 43.1-43.4 eV and S 2p peak at 162.8-163.1 eV (Pratt and Nesbitt, 2000;Bullen et al, 2003), or orpiment, As 2 S 3 , having the relevant BE of 43.4-43.8 and 162.5-162.7 eV, respectively (Costa et al, 2002;Gheorghiu-de La Rocque et al, 2002), should not be ruled out but seems unlikely (Mikhlin and Tomashevich, 2005). It is worth noting that only 1 min exposure to a ferric nitrate solution results in the surface entirely coated with products (EA-1-3), which mainly consist of Fe(III), As(V), and oxysulfur anions with S atoms in the oxidation states from +2 to +6, according to AFM, XPS, FTIR (not shown in figures) and XANES data (Mikhlin and Tomashevich, 2005).…”
Section: Surfaces Oxidized In Acidic Ferric Iron Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the photodarkening which is normally observed in chalcogenide glasses are suppressed by the addition of metals such as Cu [8], Pb [9] and Sn [10]. However, the precise nature of the mechanism that gives rise to these phenomena still remains elusive [11]. In order to clarify the microscopic mechanism of the above behavior, understanding of the fundamental materials properties is indispensable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of studies on Cu-modified arsenic selenide bulk glasses or thin films, such as localized-state distribution [1], XPS study of the Cu incorporation [2,3], optical properties and Raman spectra of photodoped chalcogenide films [4], DC conductivity and thermopower [5]. Other studies have focused on crystallization behavior and glass-forming ability in Cu-As-Se system [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%