2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XPS spectral analysis for a multiple oxide comprising NiO, TiO2, and NiTiO3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed element information is provided in the survey scan spectra (Figure S2 XPS peaks at 854.9 and 873.2 eV correspond respectively with standard 2p 3/2 and 2p 1/2 orbital energies for NiO; the 2p satellite peaks are also in the expected range at 860 and 880 eV, which confirm the samples only contained Ni(II) even under oxidation treatment. [23,24] S 2p peak energies were also investigated (Figure S3, Supporting Information) showing: The green Cysscy-NiO sample produces an XPS signal with a mode peak at 162.8 eV and a shoulder centered at 164 eV, corresponding to S 2p 3/2 and S 2p 1/2 orbital energies for disulfide bonds, respectively; the brown Cys-NiO sample exhibits an asymmetric doublet at 163.6 and 164.8 eV corresponding to metal-thiolate bonding, and the mode peak of the blue cysteine sulfonate (CysO 3 H) capped NiO sample close to 168 eV associates to the sulfonate ligand. The relative differences in peak energies for sulfide, thiolate, and sulfonate bonding are in agreement with other XPS studies of similar ligands on metal chalcogenide NPs, [25][26][27] and suggest that NaBH 4 serves mainly as a Bronsted base rather than as a reducing agent for nickel ions.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed element information is provided in the survey scan spectra (Figure S2 XPS peaks at 854.9 and 873.2 eV correspond respectively with standard 2p 3/2 and 2p 1/2 orbital energies for NiO; the 2p satellite peaks are also in the expected range at 860 and 880 eV, which confirm the samples only contained Ni(II) even under oxidation treatment. [23,24] S 2p peak energies were also investigated (Figure S3, Supporting Information) showing: The green Cysscy-NiO sample produces an XPS signal with a mode peak at 162.8 eV and a shoulder centered at 164 eV, corresponding to S 2p 3/2 and S 2p 1/2 orbital energies for disulfide bonds, respectively; the brown Cys-NiO sample exhibits an asymmetric doublet at 163.6 and 164.8 eV corresponding to metal-thiolate bonding, and the mode peak of the blue cysteine sulfonate (CysO 3 H) capped NiO sample close to 168 eV associates to the sulfonate ligand. The relative differences in peak energies for sulfide, thiolate, and sulfonate bonding are in agreement with other XPS studies of similar ligands on metal chalcogenide NPs, [25][26][27] and suggest that NaBH 4 serves mainly as a Bronsted base rather than as a reducing agent for nickel ions.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the XPS survey spectrum ( Figure S1 ), besides O 1s and Ti 2p peaks, the C 1s peak at 288.3 eV is detected, due to the adventitious hydrocarbon from the air [ 18 ]. For the Ti 2p spectrum ( Figure 2 a), the two main peaks of Ti2p 1/2 at 464.4 eV and Ti2p 3/2 at 458.6 eV are ascribed to Ti 4+ of TiO 2 [ 19 ]. Furthermore, an associated satellite peak located at 458.2 eV is detected [ 20 ], corresponding to Ti 3+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain clues for understanding the phenomena above, Ni 2p and Ti 2p spectra were collected from the topmost surface region of the heated‐treated NiTi surface, as shown in Figure 7. Then, the chemical states were analyzed using the spectral deconvolution procedure, proposed by the authors 16 . Briefly, the procedure uses spectral deconvolution analysis with the standard spectra of NiO, NiTiO 3 , and TiO 2 as components.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atomic ratio of the detected elements was calculated using the integrated intensity of the spectra and the corresponding relative sensitivity factor recorded in the instrument. Furthermore, overlapping spectra due to the coexistence of multiple chemical states were analyzed using spectral deconvolution procedure reported by the authors 16 . To summarize, reference spectra for each chemical state were collected by measuring a reliable standard material, and then the overlapping spectra were deconvoluted using the reference spectra.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%