1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(99)00253-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XPS investigation of preferential sputtering of S from MoS2 and determination of MoSx stoichiometry from Mo and S peak positions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

41
222
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
41
222
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3f. These binding energies are in good agreement with those reported values for MoS 2 crystal[20,21]. The atomic ratio of Mo/S is 1.0/1.91 for sample A2.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…3f. These binding energies are in good agreement with those reported values for MoS 2 crystal[20,21]. The atomic ratio of Mo/S is 1.0/1.91 for sample A2.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The separation energies of 3d 3/2 and 3d 5/2 was 3.10 eV, which was in good agreement with previous reports [51]. The peak at the lower binding energy of 227.12 eV corresponded to the S 2s components of molybdenite [52]. A weak peak centered at around 236.2 eV was assigned to Mo 6+ 3d 5/2 , demonstrating that the oxidation of Mo was minimal [43], which was consistent with the S 2s spectra of the molybdenite above.…”
Section: Xps Measurementsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Aside from a weak carbon signal, which is generally unavoidable, no other contaminants were observed, indicating the high purity of our samples. In a previous XPS study on bulk MoS 2 , Baker et al show that the difference in binding energy between the Mo 3d 5/2 and the S 2p 3/2 peaks can be related to the stoichiometric composition of the MoS 2 [55]. All measured samples showed a E value of 67.1 eV, corresponding to a stoichiometric ratio of x = 1.9 ± 0.1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%