1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0518(199606)34:8<1385::aid-pola1>3.0.co;2-#
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XPS and atomic force microscopy of plasma‐treated polysulfone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of sulfur at least two new signals appear in the core-level spectra with binding energies of 168.8 and 169.3 eV (Figure 4 a). [30][31][32] The intensity ratio between oxidized and unoxidized components was determined by peak fitting of the XPS signal, assuming the same peak shape for all components. [30][31][32] The intensity ratio between oxidized and unoxidized components was determined by peak fitting of the XPS signal, assuming the same peak shape for all components.…”
Section: Product Evolution Studied By Xpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of sulfur at least two new signals appear in the core-level spectra with binding energies of 168.8 and 169.3 eV (Figure 4 a). [30][31][32] The intensity ratio between oxidized and unoxidized components was determined by peak fitting of the XPS signal, assuming the same peak shape for all components. [30][31][32] The intensity ratio between oxidized and unoxidized components was determined by peak fitting of the XPS signal, assuming the same peak shape for all components.…”
Section: Product Evolution Studied By Xpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] AFM is especially suited to polymer analysis due to the low applied forces in contact mode, which can be further reduced by using tapping mode. These low forces allow the film surface to be imaged without modification by the force of the AFM tip on the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6a and b, respectively) core level XPS spectra. 61 The percentage enhancement in the area under the curve for the peak of 531.3 eV from Ps UF to Ps-nRGO UF-2 is 5.01%. But, there is a percentage decline in the concerned peak area by 4.77%, from Ps UF to Ps-nRGO UF-2 ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%