1994
DOI: 10.1016/0169-4332(94)90104-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XPS analysis of gallium oxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
72
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
13
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 shows the Ga 3d binding energy region recorded on Pd/Ga 2 O 3 during preoxidation (a) and during reduction at 448 (b), 523 (c), and 623 K (d). The main signal at 20.55 eV remained unchanged, irrespective of the atmosphere and temperature, and can unambiguously be assigned to Ga 3+ from the Ga 2 O 3 support [39]. A broad O 2s signal also originating from the Ga 2 O 3 support was additionally observed at around 23 eV and proved to be independent of atmosphere and temperature.…”
Section: In Situ Xps During H2 Reductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 shows the Ga 3d binding energy region recorded on Pd/Ga 2 O 3 during preoxidation (a) and during reduction at 448 (b), 523 (c), and 623 K (d). The main signal at 20.55 eV remained unchanged, irrespective of the atmosphere and temperature, and can unambiguously be assigned to Ga 3+ from the Ga 2 O 3 support [39]. A broad O 2s signal also originating from the Ga 2 O 3 support was additionally observed at around 23 eV and proved to be independent of atmosphere and temperature.…”
Section: In Situ Xps During H2 Reductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…toelectron peak was observed at 18.35 ± 0.10 eV. Since the observed chemical shift of 2.2 eV between Ga 3+ and the low-energy Ga species is in the range reported in the literature for oxidic and metallic Ga [39,40], and in accordance with in situ XRD, we assign this species to zero-valent Ga within the intermetallic compound Pd 2 Ga. XPS studies of bulk, metallurgically prepared PdGa (1:1 composition) additionally support our peak assignment [23]. The lower onset-temperature of intermetallic formation compared with XRD can be explained by the surface sensitivity of XPS, which in contrast to XRD does not rely on the presence of three-dimensional crystalline intermetallic particles of a certain size.…”
Section: In Situ Xps During H2 Reductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two main peaks can be differentiated for the as-grown sample. The lower binding energy peak is centered at 18.7 eV and it is due to the emission of electrons from the Ga atoms in a metallic environment 25 . This 3d peak can be resolved in a doublet thanks to the fine energy step used (0.025 eV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3b) clearly differentiate between the HRS film within the TE mark area (bright) and the pristine surface area (grey), thus indicating Figure 3c shows the m-XPS spectra collected on the pristine and polarized film surfaces, respectively. The pristine film exhibits three different Ga valence states; a strong peak at 20.7 eV (P 1 ) is assigned to the oxide (Ga 3 þ ) 39 state, a peak at around 19.6 eV (P 2 ) to the suboxide (Ga þ ) 39,40 state and a pair of small peaks at 18.7 (P 3 ) and 18.2 eV (P 4 ) can be assigned to the metal (Ga 0 ) state (by comparing with a GaCo alloy reference sample, Supplementary Fig. 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%