2019
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201804-0654oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Xpert MTB/RIF Assay as a Substitute for Smear Microscopy in an Intermediate-Burden Setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, contact tracing based on threshold cycle ( C T ) value or semiquantitative result of molecular tests are still needed to make a direct link between DNA burden and transmission potential. Similar results have been observed in different TB burden settings, suggesting that semiquantitative molecular tests could replace smear microscopy to initiate pulmonary TB diagnosis and treatment as well as to guide airborne isolation strategies (1, 5). Based on these findings, we maintained a smear-independent algorithm based initially on Xpert and now on Ultra to initiate the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, contact tracing based on threshold cycle ( C T ) value or semiquantitative result of molecular tests are still needed to make a direct link between DNA burden and transmission potential. Similar results have been observed in different TB burden settings, suggesting that semiquantitative molecular tests could replace smear microscopy to initiate pulmonary TB diagnosis and treatment as well as to guide airborne isolation strategies (1, 5). Based on these findings, we maintained a smear-independent algorithm based initially on Xpert and now on Ultra to initiate the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Xpert displays reduced turnaround time and shortened patient isolation and time to initiate anti-TB drugs and is more sensitive and specific than smear microscopy for acid-fast bacillus (AFB) detection. This test is now recommended to initiate the microbial diagnosis of tuberculosis (13), as well as to address patient’s transmission potential based on the semiquantitative result (1, 4, 5). Despite a very low limit of detection (LOD; ∼131 CFU/ml), Xpert remains less sensitive than liquid culture (LOD ∼1 to 50 CFU/ml) (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some strengths of our study should be mentioned. The hospital's mycobacterial laboratory is staffed by specialized technicians in all stages of the process, with 1 professional performing AFB smears, which demonstrates higher sensitivity values than other studies, such as Lee et al, 19 who demonstrated AFB smear sensitivity of 38%. Also, the clinicallaboratory relationship in our hospital favors the implementation of protocols and process improvements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These results are in accordance with previous publications. [10][11][12] Furthermore, regardless of HIV status, we found that Xpert C T values negatively correlated with plasma CRP levels (P = 0.002, r = −0.52 for HIV− and P = 0.0004, r = −0.57 for HIV+; Fig. 1c) and the Timika radiographic severity score (P = 0.0002, r = −0.61 for HIV− and P < 0.004, r = −0.48 for HIV+; Fig.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%