2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XMM-Newton observation of the Lockman Hole

Abstract: Abstract. We present the results of the X-ray spectral analysis of the first deep X-ray survey with the XMM-Newton observatory during Performance Verification. The X-ray data of the Lockman Hole field and the derived cumulative source counts were reported by Hasinger et al. (2001). We restrict the analysis to the sample of 98 sources with more than 70 net counts (flux limit in the [0.5-7] keV band of 1.6 × 10 −15 erg cm −2 s −1 ) of which 61 have redshift identification. We find no correlation between the spec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
295
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(84 reference statements)
37
295
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the previous study of Panessa & Bassani (2002) who estimated that the fraction of unobscured Seyfert 2 (Sy2) varies between 10 to 30%. These results are consistent with what was found by Mainieri et al (2002) (30%) and Caccianiga et al (2004) (12%). However, Risaliti et al (1999) found an even smaller fraction of only 4%.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This is in agreement with the previous study of Panessa & Bassani (2002) who estimated that the fraction of unobscured Seyfert 2 (Sy2) varies between 10 to 30%. These results are consistent with what was found by Mainieri et al (2002) (30%) and Caccianiga et al (2004) (12%). However, Risaliti et al (1999) found an even smaller fraction of only 4%.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This distribution confirm the already remarked disagreement between the prediction from X-ray background population synthesis models ( [5]), with a maximum around z ∼ 1.5, and the recent observations. Such a discrepancy was already noted for the 100 ksec observation of the Lockman Hole with XMM-Newton [8] and for the 1 Msec Chandra survey of the CDFS [10].…”
Section: X-ray Samplementioning
confidence: 60%
“…In particular, the EPIC cameras have a larger field-of-view than ACIS allowing for the detection of a number of new diffuse sources just outside the Chandra field-of-view. The EPIC instruments have unprecedent high sensitivity in the hard X-ray band, and in the [5][6][7][8][9][10] keV band our dataset is comparable to the 1Ms Chandra image. Analysis of the Lockman Hole (LH; [7]) has also confirmed the idea that Xray spectroscopy of a large number of sources is very powerful with XMM-Newton.…”
Section: X-ray Observationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations