2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XMM–Newton and NuSTAR joint observations of Mrk 915: a deep look into the X-ray properties★

Abstract: We report on the X-ray monitoring programme (covering slightly more than 11 days) carried out jointly by XMM-Newton and NuSTAR on the intermediate Seyfert galaxy Mrk 915. The light curves extracted in different energy ranges show a variation in intensity but not a significant change in spectral shape. The X-ray spectra reveal the presence of a two-phase warm absorber: a fully covering mildly ionized structure [log ξ/(ergs cm s −1 ) ∼ 2.3, N H ∼ 1.3 × 10 21 cm −2 ] and a partial covering (∼ 90 per cent) lower i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that similar differences between EPIC-pn and FPMA/B slopes have been recently reported in the literature (e.g. Cappi et al 2016;Ballo et al 2017).…”
Section: The Variable Spectral Components At Low Energiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We note that similar differences between EPIC-pn and FPMA/B slopes have been recently reported in the literature (e.g. Cappi et al 2016;Ballo et al 2017).…”
Section: The Variable Spectral Components At Low Energiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We find that one reflection component is a good representation of the spectra for only three objects in our sample, i.e., Mrk 915, Mrk 1044, and IGRJ 19378-0617. Supporting these results, Ballo et al (2017) find that the reflection component of Mrk 915 can be explained with a cold reflection from distant matter, and Mallick et al (2018) find that the broad-band spectrum of Mrk 1044 can be explained through a relativistic reflection from a high-density accretion disk with a broken power-law emissivity profile.…”
Section: Reflection Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We derive a distance between the two hard X-ray-emitting regions of a = (5 ± 1) × 10 −3 pc. Assuming a circular orbit, the relative velocity between the putative black holes is ∆v = 2πaP −1 0 = (3.4 ± 0.7) × 10 −2 c. Previous X-ray spectroscopy analyses of the source (e.g., Severgnini et al 2015;Ballo et al 2017) have not unveiled any double Fe Kα feature. In particular, XMM-Newton, with its energy resolution of ∼ 0.15 keV at the line energy, detects a single Fe Kα line at E = 6.42 ± 0.02 keV with no double peaks (Ballo et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Assuming a circular orbit, the relative velocity between the putative black holes is ∆v = 2πaP −1 0 = (3.4 ± 0.7) × 10 −2 c. Previous X-ray spectroscopy analyses of the source (e.g., Severgnini et al 2015;Ballo et al 2017) have not unveiled any double Fe Kα feature. In particular, XMM-Newton, with its energy resolution of ∼ 0.15 keV at the line energy, detects a single Fe Kα line at E = 6.42 ± 0.02 keV with no double peaks (Ballo et al 2017). We can therefore conclude that, if the binary system is able to produce a double peak, the energy separation between the two peaks would be ∆E 0.15 keV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%