International Symposium on Innovations in Information and Communications Technology 2011
DOI: 10.1109/isiict.2011.6149595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XMap++: A novel semantic approach for alignment of OWL-Full ontologies based on semantic relationship using WordNet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can perform data query work at the semantic level, but its disadvantage is that the process is more complicated and the implementation is more difficult. OLA [16][17] is a data fusion system that maps from a grammatical point of view. The system mainly analyzes the constituent elements in the ontology, and uses the comprehensive value of the Hamming Distance and the tagging distance between elements to represent the semantic correlation between different elements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can perform data query work at the semantic level, but its disadvantage is that the process is more complicated and the implementation is more difficult. OLA [16][17] is a data fusion system that maps from a grammatical point of view. The system mainly analyzes the constituent elements in the ontology, and uses the comprehensive value of the Hamming Distance and the tagging distance between elements to represent the semantic correlation between different elements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of ontology matching research follows the feature engineering approach (Wang and Xu, 2008;Cruz et al, 2009;Khadir et al, 2011;Jiménez-Ruiz and Grau, 2011;Fahad et al, 2012;Ngo and Bellahsene, 2012;Gulić et al, 2016). Features are generated using a broad range of techniques (Anam et al, 2015;Harispe et al, 2015), ranging from the exploitation of terminological information, including structural similarities and logical constraints, such as datatype properties, cardinality constraints, etc.…”
Section: Selecting Features For Ontology Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%