2020
DOI: 10.1109/tnsm.2020.2980752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XLR (piXel Loss Rate): A Lightweight Indicator to Measure Video QoE in IP Networks

Abstract: A novel Key Quality Indicator for video delivery applications, XLR (piXel Loss Rate), is defined, characterized, and evaluated. The proposed indicator is an objective measure that captures the effects of transmission errors in the received video, has a good correlation with subjective Mean Opinion Scores, and provides comparable results with state-of-the-art Full-Reference metrics. Moreover, XLR can be estimated using only a lightweight analysis on the compressed bitstream, thus allowing a No-Reference operati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose was to show that the subjective quality of a video cannot be predicted from the visual quality of the frame alone when some hidden error occurs. In [26], a new objective indicator, the pixel loss rate (XLR), was proposed. It evaluates the packet loss rate during video streaming.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose was to show that the subjective quality of a video cannot be predicted from the visual quality of the frame alone when some hidden error occurs. In [26], a new objective indicator, the pixel loss rate (XLR), was proposed. It evaluates the packet loss rate during video streaming.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [ 12 ] proposed XLR (Pixel Loss Rate), a new key quality indicator for video distribution applications. The suggested indicator offers comparable results with existing full reference measures, incorporates the effects of transmission errors in the received video and has a high correlation with subjective MOS scores.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that packet loss effect is directly related with packet loss rate [36]. In particular, in H.264 and later codecs, this effect is related to packet loss burst rate and the coding structure (intra frame refresh period) [32], which are the main components of the "Loss Magnitude" or "piXel Loss Rate" [12]:…”
Section: Video Coding Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It leads to coding latencies of T cod = N cod /F . Parameters m 0 and m 1 for packet loss effect have been computed from [12]. Finally, the values for T m that we have used are T m = "Max.…”
Section: Parametrization Of the Different Use Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%