1933
DOI: 10.1080/00222933308673767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XIX.—A new family of Hemiptera-Heteroptera with notes on the Phylogeny of the suborder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences are sufficient enough to warrant a family status at par with the Notonectidae as suggested by China (1933) and Pendergrast (1957). Summary 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These differences are sufficient enough to warrant a family status at par with the Notonectidae as suggested by China (1933) and Pendergrast (1957). Summary 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The Pleinae along with the Notonectinae, Anisopinae and Helotrephinae were described by Distant (1902), Reuter (1912) and Pruthi (1925) as sub-families of the family Notonectidae. China (1933), however, gives Pleinae and Helotrephinae the status of distinct families, Pleidae and Helotrephidae, while he places the Notonectinae and Anisopinae under the family Notonectidae. He is further of the opinion that though these families are of somewhat obscure origin, they form a natural group showing a definite sequence of specialisation among themselves, the Notonectidae being the most generalised and the Helotrephidae being the most specialised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationships between the extant families of the true water bugs (Hemiptera–Heteroptera, infraorder Nepomorpha) have been highly controversial (Esaki & China, 1927; China, 1933, 1955; Popham, 1960; Cobben, 1968; Popov, 1971; Lee, 1991). The most recent studies have increased the taxonomic coverage and refined the set of morphological characters used over previous efforts and also introduced cladistic methods in the study of the systematics of the Nepomorpha (Rieger, 1976; Mahner, 1993; Andersen, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obsolete or vestigial eyes have been found in obligatory cavernicoles such as Speovelia sp. (Mesoveliidae) from the Hawaiian islands (HOWARTH, 1972),but not in Speovelia maritima known from sea caves in Japan (ESAKI, 1929), nor in Leotkhius (Leotichiidae), strange cavedwelling shore bugs in Malaya and Burma (CHINA, 1933).…”
Section: Eyes With Less Than 5 Ommatidiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the work of CHINAÄ USINGER (1949), HERRING (1955), LUNDBLAD (1934), and POISSON (1951POISSON ( , 1952POISSON ( , 1957 ZINSKY 1958, CHINA 1933, CHINA & MYERS 1929, DRAKE & SLATER 1957, DRAKE & DAVIS 1960, EMSLEY 1969, KORMILEV 1961, LAUCK & MENKE 1961, MCATEE & MALLOCH 1924, PARSONS 1959, SEIDENSTÜCKER 1964, SLATER & SWEET 1965, STYS 1967, USINGER 1943, USINGER & MATSUDA 1959, WOOD-WARD 1956, WYGODZINSKY 1966, WYGODZINSKY & USINGER 1963 and from my own counts, the adult tarsal formula by major group is as follows : Dipsocoromorpha: Schizopteridae J (mostly 3, 3, 3), ? (mostly 2, 2, 3); other families have additional taxa having two-segmented tarsi.…”
Section: Number Of Tarsal Segmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%