2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1144-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XFEL structures of the human MT2 melatonin receptor reveal the basis of subtype selectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
141
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
13
141
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistently, ICOA‐9 shows both, MT 2 selectivity and signaling bias, as well as 4‐phenyl‐2‐propionamidotetralin (4‐P‐PDOT) (Figure C), the gold‐standard ligand to show MT 2 ‐dependent effects, which has also been shown to display signaling bias . Molecular docking of 4‐P‐PDOT and superposition with 2‐PMT in the crystal structure indicates that the phenyl side chains of 4‐P‐PDOT and 2‐PMT occupy a similar but not identical space (see the space limited by the red circle in . The fact that the cis enantiomer of 4‐P‐PDOT has more than 100 times higher affinity for human MT 2 than the trans enantiomer indicates that the phenyl and the propionamido side chains are oriented toward the same side compared to the tetralin ring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Consistently, ICOA‐9 shows both, MT 2 selectivity and signaling bias, as well as 4‐phenyl‐2‐propionamidotetralin (4‐P‐PDOT) (Figure C), the gold‐standard ligand to show MT 2 ‐dependent effects, which has also been shown to display signaling bias . Molecular docking of 4‐P‐PDOT and superposition with 2‐PMT in the crystal structure indicates that the phenyl side chains of 4‐P‐PDOT and 2‐PMT occupy a similar but not identical space (see the space limited by the red circle in . The fact that the cis enantiomer of 4‐P‐PDOT has more than 100 times higher affinity for human MT 2 than the trans enantiomer indicates that the phenyl and the propionamido side chains are oriented toward the same side compared to the tetralin ring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The difference between MT1 and MT2 receptor may be attributed in part to the sharp decrease in MT2 receptor expression observed in the later stages of thrombopoiesis ( Figure S11) or restricted binding site of MT2 receptor, preventing MT access. 28 Another binding site, MT3 receptor, with low-affinity for MT, is involved in the protection of cells from oxidative injuries by inhibition of electron transfer. 29,30 Therefore, the effect of MT3 receptor on MK activities needs to be further evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different receptors have different sized loops and N‐ and C‐termini. The general structure of GPCRs was described by crystallographers and structuralists; all GPCRs have a quite uniform structure, including melatonin receptors . Indeed, the field of melatonin receptors has made remarkably important structural advances, as recently reviewed by Cecon et al…”
Section: Receptors and Drugs: The Pastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those basic structures were decorated with a paramount of functions (see Zlotos et al and Spadoni et al for chemical details). Moreover, the crystal structures of MT 1 and MT 2 receptors were recently published . These structures provide the opportunity to find more diverse antagonistic compounds.…”
Section: The 5d Space Exemplified By Melatonin Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%