2009
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XF-70 and XF-73, novel antibacterial agents active against slow-growing and non-dividing cultures of Staphylococcus aureus including biofilms

Abstract: XF-70 and XF-73 remained highly active against various forms of slow-growing or non-dividing S. aureus. The results support the hypothesis that membrane-active agents may be particularly effective in eradicating slow- or non-growing bacteria and suggest that XF-70 and XF-73 could be utilized to treat staphylococcal infections where the organisms are only dividing slowly, such as biofilm-associated infections of prosthetic devices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
65
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with the lack of structure-specific resistance to the other drugs, these results suggest that the membranes of biofilm cells may be different from those of planktonic cells and that the structure (i.e., the matrix) of the biofilm acts as a shield for these more sensitive cells. This is in line with several recent studies that have shown that the cell membrane physiology changes significantly during biofilm growth (1,12,45,49,55). Thus, a picture is beginning to emerge wherein membrane charge and physiology are different in biofilm cells relative to their planktonic counterparts, and this difference can contribute to the efficacy of antibiotic therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Together with the lack of structure-specific resistance to the other drugs, these results suggest that the membranes of biofilm cells may be different from those of planktonic cells and that the structure (i.e., the matrix) of the biofilm acts as a shield for these more sensitive cells. This is in line with several recent studies that have shown that the cell membrane physiology changes significantly during biofilm growth (1,12,45,49,55). Thus, a picture is beginning to emerge wherein membrane charge and physiology are different in biofilm cells relative to their planktonic counterparts, and this difference can contribute to the efficacy of antibiotic therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…One approach to addressing these pharmacodynamics (PD) questions has been to compare the MICs of antibiotics for bacteria in biofilms (bMIC) to the corresponding MICs of those bacteria and drugs estimated by standard CLSI (13) liquid culture protocols (5,12,27,39,45,(49)(50)(51). A limitation of this method is an inability to control for the contribution of the physiological state and density of the bacteria in the biofilms in the way they are controlled for in the CLSI MIC protocol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, the novel porphyrin antibacterial agents XF-70 and XF-73 were shown to remain highly active against this type of bacteria (Ooi et al, 2010). Hu et al (2010) found that the small quinolone-derived compound HT61 was active against non-multiplying MSSA and MRSA by causing depolarization of the cell membrane and destruction of the cell wall.…”
Section: Targeting the Persistent Microbial Phenotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of known resistance mechanisms was found not to have any effect on the antibacterial activity of XF-73 (10), suggesting that the mechanism of action of XF-73 is novel. XF-73 has also been shown to be equally active against nongrowing S. aureus and against S. aureus within biofilms (28). XF-73 is being developed as a topical drug to prevent and treat S. aureus, and MRSA infections and clinical trials are under way to assess the potential for the nasal decolonization of S. aureus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%