2008
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Xenograft Versus Extraction Alone for Ridge Preservation After Tooth Removal: A Clinical and Histomorphometric Study

Abstract: The ridge-preservation approach using porcine bone in combination with collagen membrane significantly limited the resorption of hard tissue ridge after tooth extraction compared to extraction alone. Furthermore, the histologic analysis showed a significantly higher percentage of trabecular bone and total mineralized tissue in ridge-preservation sites compared to extraction-alone sites 7 months after tooth removal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

31
445
9
28

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(519 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
31
445
9
28
Order By: Relevance
“…Lekovic et al (1998) reported an average buccal height reduction of 1.5 mm, Camargo et al (2000) reported 1 mm, and van der Weijden et al (2009) reported 1.67-2.03 mm. Most studies were consistent with the conclusion that the height reduction was more pronounced at the labial bone wall than at the palatal bone wall (Lekovic et al, 1998;Schropp et al, 2003;Araujo and Lindhe, 2005;Barone et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lekovic et al (1998) reported an average buccal height reduction of 1.5 mm, Camargo et al (2000) reported 1 mm, and van der Weijden et al (2009) reported 1.67-2.03 mm. Most studies were consistent with the conclusion that the height reduction was more pronounced at the labial bone wall than at the palatal bone wall (Lekovic et al, 1998;Schropp et al, 2003;Araujo and Lindhe, 2005;Barone et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This might partially be the reason why studies using the method of flap elevation (Lekovic et al, 1998;Camargo et al, 2000) reported more resorption. Despite the inconsistent amount of bone resorption, most studies agreed the fact that the horizontal reduction was more pronounced at the labial bone wall than at the palatal bone wall (Lekovic et al, 1998;Schropp et al, 2003;Araujo and Lindhe, 2005;Barone et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…11B). Comparative data from modern human populations (Lekovic et al 1998;Kiliaridis et al 2000;Christou and Kiliaridis 2007;Barone et al 2008) permit to provide minimum estimates of the "edentulous life span" of the D3900 individual. Assuming ~0.25-0.65mm of alveolar bone resorption per month of edentulous life [calculated from external and internal vertical wall loss over a period of 6-7 months (Lekovic et al 1998;Barone et al 2008)] results in a minimum of ~26-64 months of edentulous life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors agree that filling dental sockets with bone graft biomaterials at the moment of the tooth extraction to preserve alveolar morphology is an effective treatment to prevent the bone reabsorption and MAA [23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%