2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.012309.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Xeno‐implantation of pig chondrocytes into rabbit to treat localized articular cartilage defects: an animal model

Abstract: Articular cartilage has only a limited ability to regenerate. The transplantation of autologous chondrocytes is currently used to treat focal defects in human articular cartilage, although use of organs, tissues, or cells from different species is being investigated as an alternative treatment. The object of this study was to use xeno-transplantation of cultured pig chondrocytes for the repair of rabbit chondral defects, and to analyze the significance of tissue rejection in this animal model. Partial chondral… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although allogeneic sources have been commonly used for in vivo studies of cartilaginous tissue replacement, the use of xenogeneic sources is less common, 24,[27][28][29][30][31] but the available data indicate that xenogeneic cell sources may be used in cartilage and meniscal tissue engineering because of the immunoprivileged nature of these cells. 24,[27][28][29][30][31] The benefits of using a xenogeneic cell source for cartilage engineering are significant. Concerns regarding donor-site morbidity and difficulties associated with obtaining a sufficient number of cells required for tissue engineering efforts such as highdensity scaffold-free cartilage formation can be mediated using a xenogeneic approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although allogeneic sources have been commonly used for in vivo studies of cartilaginous tissue replacement, the use of xenogeneic sources is less common, 24,[27][28][29][30][31] but the available data indicate that xenogeneic cell sources may be used in cartilage and meniscal tissue engineering because of the immunoprivileged nature of these cells. 24,[27][28][29][30][31] The benefits of using a xenogeneic cell source for cartilage engineering are significant. Concerns regarding donor-site morbidity and difficulties associated with obtaining a sufficient number of cells required for tissue engineering efforts such as highdensity scaffold-free cartilage formation can be mediated using a xenogeneic approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] Moreover, studies testing allogeneic (human and leporine) and xenogeneic (porcine to leporine and leporine to caprine) implantation of ACs support these in vitro experiments, reporting that they produce little to no immune response. [27][28][29][30][31] A comparison of the literature results suggests that the degree of immune reaction to implanted cartilage material is inversely related to the amount of ECM it contains, indicating that, along with lacking critical surface markers involved with the induction of an immune response, cartilage ECM may shield immunogenic markers on chondrocytes from host T-cells, enhancing the reparative capacity of these therapies. 31 Although little investigation has been made into the immunogenicity of meniscus cells (MCs), some evidence suggests that they may share an immunoprivileged profile similar to that of chondrocytes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though isolated chondrocytes result in immunogenic reaction, alloimplantation of chondrocytes encapsulated in their ECM (Schreiber et al, 1999) or embedded in collagen gel (Wakitani et al, 1989) or agarose (Rahfoth et al, 1998) resulted in few or no rejection reactions. Notably, xenotransplantation in vivo of cultured pig chondrocytes into rabbit chondral defects closed with periosteal membrane no signs of infiltration by immune cells (Ramallal et al, 2004).…”
Section: Allotransplantation and Xenotransplantation Of Chondrocytesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other therapeutic alternatives are allotransplantation (Wakitani et al, 1989;Rahfoth et al, 1998;Schreiber et al, 1999) and xenotransplantation of chondrocytes , Ramallal et al, 2004, that elude the damage added to the joint during autotransplantation to obtain isolated chondrocytes. Allotransplantation is constrained by the necessity for compatible donors and limitations on storage of cartilage or chondrocytes because cryopreservation reduces survival and proliferation of chondrocytes (RendalVázquez et al, 2001).…”
Section: Allotransplantation and Xenotransplantation Of Chondrocytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, varying degrees of responses have been described in diff erent experimental settings when the grafts are implanted in vivo into joint defects, which was dependant on how the heterologous cells were implanted. For example, after rabbit articular cartilage defects were treated with pig chondrocytes and covered with a periosteal graft, signifi cant tissue repair was observed after 24 weeks, showing a 90% defect fi ll and a good histological score; furthermore, neocartilage showed chondrocyte like cells, a smooth hyaline morphology and no tissue rejection was reported (Ramallal et al, 2004). In another report, rabbit chondrocytes suspended in fibrin glue were transplanted into goat full-thickness articularcartilage defects.…”
Section: Engineering Of Heterologous Mscs Into Cartilagementioning
confidence: 99%