2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90503-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XBRL Implementation in the European Union: Exploring Preparers’ Points of View

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine our research questions, we considered Poland as a case study. Before the ESEF requirements came into force, XBRL or Inline XBRL adoption had been under consideration at the national level within the EU (Di Fabio, Roncagliolo, Avallone, Ramassa, 2019). As a result, the dissemination of these technologies varied in diverse geographical locations there.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To examine our research questions, we considered Poland as a case study. Before the ESEF requirements came into force, XBRL or Inline XBRL adoption had been under consideration at the national level within the EU (Di Fabio, Roncagliolo, Avallone, Ramassa, 2019). As a result, the dissemination of these technologies varied in diverse geographical locations there.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, on the one hand, Pinsker and Li (2008) observe the low-cost perception of XBRL adoption among surveyed companies. On the other hand, Di Fabio et al (2019) indicate that ESMA's public consultation participants drew attention in their comments to the advantage of implementation and maintenance costs over potential benefits. In the same vein, Collis, Alkhatib and de Cesare (2018) and Dunne et al (2009) emphasise the particularly high costs of software solutions.…”
Section: Rq 2: Benefits Drawbacks and Costs Of Inline Xbrl Introducti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 of December 17, 2018, which defines the specification of ESEF, annual consolidated financial statements of issuers of securities admitted to trading on EU-regulated markets, prepared under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), should be only produced using Inline XBRL (EC 2018). As expected by the European Commission (EC), this technology should impact all relevant stakeholders positively (Di Fabio et al 2019). Also, a considerable amount of prior academic literature on the topic has emphasized various potential benefits of XBRL-enabled financial reporting (e.g., Gunn 2007;Steenkamp & Nel 2012;Liu 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the case of the European Union (EU) Member States, XBRL and Inline XBRL have been voluntarily implemented for financial reporting purposes at the national level so far. However, with the emergence of the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF), this circumstance has changed for a specific group of entities, starting with reporting periods beginning in 2020 or later (Di Fabio et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet stakeholder insistences for more preponderant speed and volume of communications, the extensible business reporting language (XBRL) is a fast-growing international reporting standard for e-reporting of corporate accounts (SEC, 2009). In the past 20 years, XBRL has been used in approximately 50 countries worldwide (Di Fabio et al , 2019). Fortified by large corporations and regulators worldwide, XBRL is set to engender incipient benchmarks for the expeditious dissemination of corporate information among stakeholders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%