1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008099315152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 (left panel) shows the effective area curves for WXT. These data are obtained via realistic ray-tracing simulations taking into account the imperfectness of the MPO arrays [17], which are in good agreement with the simulation results from the Q software developed at the University of Leicester [16]. The Grasp parameter (effective area times FoV) is also shown in Figure 2…”
Section: Instrumentssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Figure 2 (left panel) shows the effective area curves for WXT. These data are obtained via realistic ray-tracing simulations taking into account the imperfectness of the MPO arrays [17], which are in good agreement with the simulation results from the Q software developed at the University of Leicester [16]. The Grasp parameter (effective area times FoV) is also shown in Figure 2…”
Section: Instrumentssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For example, one of them is the shallow decaying behavior, which appears after the steep decay phase. The flux-decay becomes shallow, when the flux decays as ∝ t −(0.2−0.8) up to a break time ∼ 10 3−4 s [40,41]. Although various modifications of the standard model have been put forward to explain the observations, none of which seems conclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Swift satellite (Gehrels et al 2004) and its X-ray telescope (Burrows et al 2005b) have opened a new window into the early lives of γ-ray Bursts (GRBs) and their afterglows. We see a complex array of behaviors, many of which appear to directly conflict (e.g., O'Brien et al 2006;Panaitescu et al 2006;Willingale et al 2006) the well tested internal-external shock GRB and afterglow model (Rees & Mészáros 1994;Sari & Piran 1997;Sari, Piran, & Narayan 1998;Wijers & Galama 1999). In this "fireball" model, the GRB is produced via collisions of shells in a relativistic outflow, and an afterglow arises later as the ejecta sweep up and heat the surrounding medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%