Untitled

doi:10.1111/sipr.2010.4.issue-1

Cited by 16 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, the composition of youths’ neighbors may influence depression. Living in an area where neighbors are accepting of your identity and endorse sociopolitical positions that involve ending institutional discrimination may be beneficial for LGBQ youth (Hatzenbuehler, 2010). Many LGBQ people move to urban and metropolitan areas (e.g., San Francisco, Atlanta) because there are higher concentrations of other LGBQ people and people living in urban areas generally hold more progressive social positions (Aldrich, 2004; Black, Gates, Sanders, & Taylor, 2002; Cooke & Rapino, 2007; Knopp & Brown, 2003; Walther & Poston, 2004); however, these areas tend to have high costs of living.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychosocial Risk and Protective Factors for Depression Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Queer Youth: A Systematic Review

Hall

2017

Journal of Homosexuality

163

145

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer (LGBQ) youth suffer from depression. Identifying modifiable risk and protective factors for depression can inform the development of psychosocial interventions. The aim of this review is to evaluate the methodological characteristics and summarize the substantive findings of studies examining psychosocial risk and protective factors for depression among LGBQ youth. Eight bibliographic databases were searched, and 35 studies that met all inclusion criteria were included for review. Results show that prominent risk factors for depression include internalized LGBQ-related oppression, stress from hiding and managing a socially stigmatized identity, maladaptive coping, parental rejection, abuse and other traumatic events, negative interpersonal interactions, negative religious experiences, school bullying victimization, and violence victimization in community settings. Prominent protective factors include a positive LGBQ identity, self-esteem, social support from friends, and family support. LGBQ youth may face an array of threats to their mental health originating from multiple socioecological levels.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychosocial Risk and Protective Factors for Depression Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Queer Youth: A Systematic Review

Hall

2017

Journal of Homosexuality

163

145

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Conversely, advocates of the multicultural strategy promote the recognition and maintaining of cultural identities, and see learning about and from diversities as the most efficient way of reducing prejudice. Unlike multicultural and color-blind ideologies that both aim to fight against inequalities but with different strategies, assimilation aims to protect the majority culture and may entail abandoning minority group identities (Rattan and Anbady 2013;Rosenthal and Levy 2010). Assimilation has proved to be the diversity ideology with the most negative effects on intergroup-dynamics: it is associated with greater ethnocentrism and stereotyping and does not have positive effects to compensate for these; furthermore, it is rarely supported by members of minoritized groups (Van Oudenhoven, Prins, and Buunk 1998).…”

Section: Assimilation Color-blindness and Multiculturalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is known that individuals rarely hold only one diversity ideology; however, there is a lack of studies on the variation in diversity ideologies situationally or with regard to different forms of diversity (Rattan and Anbady 2013). Knowing these strengths and weaknesses of the different diversity ideologies, Rosenthal and Levy (2010) argue for the need also to develop balanced educational approaches that maxmize the benefits and minimize the shortcomings of different diversity ideologies.…”

Section: Assimilation Color-blindness and Multiculturalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Stuart Wells 2014), and enquiry into the justifications of the underlying ideas of these different educational approaches is needed. Social-psychological knowledge on the flaws and benefits of different diversity ideologies (for reviews see Rattan & Ambady 2013;Rosenthal and Levy 2010) can provide important insight for this task.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The social psychological research literature (see e.g. Rattan and Anbady 2013;Rosenthal and Levy 2010) promotes a finely nuanced understanding of the impact of the different diversity ideologies for social relations. The present qualitative case study draws on this strand of research when analyzing Finnish and Swedish principals' ideals and practices of leading multicultural schools and supporting Muslim inclusion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

School principals’ diversity ideologies in fostering the inclusion of Muslims in Finnish and Swedish schools

Rissanen

2019

Race Ethnicity and Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mainstream scholarly approaches to improving equity in education, including culturally responsive education, promote multicultural recognition of diversity and abandon color-blindness as an ineffective strategy. The social psychological literature affords a more nuanced understanding of the merits of different diversity ideologies. However, these research strands rarely address religion. It is vital to study the actualization and influences of different diversity ideologies with respect to different forms of diversity and different contexts. This study analyzes Finnish and Swedish principals' diversity ideologies in fostering Muslim inclusion. The principals rely mainly on color-blind ideology, but assimilation into the secular normativity of the school is also commonly pursued. Multicultural ideology commonly applies to linguistic diversity, while Islam is excluded from the multiculturalist discourse. Reflexivity regarding the complex dynamics of recognizing individual vs. group identities in education as well as understanding of the implications of religion-blindness is called for.

show abstract

Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Among US Black Individuals

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IMPORTANCEAs stated in the DSM-5, it is generally reported that the prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is lower among Black individuals compared with the general population. However, Black individuals living in countries where they are considered a minority population group (eg, in Northern America and Europe) are underrepresented in studies evaluating ADHD.OBJECTIVE To estimate the pooled prevalence of ADHD and identify associated risk factors among US Black individuals.DATA SOURCES This systematic review and meta-analysis identified peer-reviewed studies published until October 18, 2019, using the APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, ERIC, and Education Source databases.STUDY SELECTION Eligible trials were published in French or English, had empirical data on the prevalence of ADHD in samples or subsamples of Black people, and were conducted in countries with Black minority populations. All studies were assessed and passed quality evaluation. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESISThe PRISMA guideline was used for extracting and reporting data. Random-effects meta-analyses were generated to estimate the prevalence of ADHD among Black individuals using the metafor package in R. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESPrevalence and risk factors associated with ADHD among Black individuals were identified.RESULTS A total of 24 independent samples and subsamples from 21 studies published between 1979 and 2020 (154 818 Black participants) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. All included studies were conducted in the US. Two studies were conducted assessing adults (aged 18 years or older), 8 assessing children (0-12 years), 1 assessing adolescents (aged 13-17 years), and 13 assessing both children and adolescents. The pooled prevalence of ADHD was 14.54% (95% CI, 10.64%-19.56%). In a narrative review of the studies in this analysis, some studies found risk factors associated with ADHD, such as sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, race, and socioeconomic status), familial factors, environmental factors, and risk behaviors, but the data did not permit a moderation analysis to assess these findings in this study. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEContrary to what is stated in the DSM-5, the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that Black individuals are at higher risk for ADHD diagnoses than the general US population. These results highlight a need to increase ADHD assessment and monitoring among Black individuals from different social backgrounds. They also higlight the importance of establishing accurate diagnoses and culturally appropriate care.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 16 publications

References 0 publications

Psychosocial Risk and Protective Factors for Depression Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Queer Youth: A Systematic Review

Psychosocial Risk and Protective Factors for Depression Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Queer Youth: A Systematic Review

School principals’ diversity ideologies in fostering the inclusion of Muslims in Finnish and Swedish schools

Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Among US Black Individuals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About