2015
DOI: 10.3366/ajicl.2015.0114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-raying Injury Findings in South Africa's Anti-Dumping Investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…122 In NAFTA, there is less regard to the effect of TDIs on consumer welfare, as the main priority is the protection of domestic industries. 123 The USA previously expressed "philosophical concerns" with a Canadian proposal to give more weight to consumers' interests wondering how judgments on legitimate domestic concerns would be made, and whether national decisions would be challengeable under the DSU. 124 On the other hand, Canadian legislation requires that public interest should be considered upon request of any interested parties or through the initiative of the investigating authority, typically through the application of the lesser duty rule.…”
Section: Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…122 In NAFTA, there is less regard to the effect of TDIs on consumer welfare, as the main priority is the protection of domestic industries. 123 The USA previously expressed "philosophical concerns" with a Canadian proposal to give more weight to consumers' interests wondering how judgments on legitimate domestic concerns would be made, and whether national decisions would be challengeable under the DSU. 124 On the other hand, Canadian legislation requires that public interest should be considered upon request of any interested parties or through the initiative of the investigating authority, typically through the application of the lesser duty rule.…”
Section: Ementioning
confidence: 99%