1997
DOI: 10.1086/310430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-Ray Variability Coherence: How to Compute It, What It Means, and How It Constrains Models of GX 339−4 and Cygnus X-1

Abstract: We describe how the coherence function-a Fourier frequency-dependent measure of the linear correlation between time series measured simultaneously in two energy channels-can be used in conjunction with energy spectra, power spectra, and time delays between energy channels to constrain models of the spectrum and variability of X-ray binaries. Here we present a procedure for estimating the coherence function in the presence of counting noise. We apply this method to the black hole candidates Cyg X-1 and GX 339-4… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
324
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(343 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
14
324
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The n 2 term is a bias term, which arises because the Poisson noise-level contributes to the modulussquared of the cross-spectrum 4 . Formally, the coherence indicates the fraction of variance in both bands which can be predicted via a linear transformation between the two light curves (Vaughan & Nowak 1997). A reduction in coherence can also occur due to a non-linear transformation (see the discussion in Vaughan & Nowak 1997;Nowak et al 1999).…”
Section: The Coherence and Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The n 2 term is a bias term, which arises because the Poisson noise-level contributes to the modulussquared of the cross-spectrum 4 . Formally, the coherence indicates the fraction of variance in both bands which can be predicted via a linear transformation between the two light curves (Vaughan & Nowak 1997). A reduction in coherence can also occur due to a non-linear transformation (see the discussion in Vaughan & Nowak 1997;Nowak et al 1999).…”
Section: The Coherence and Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the coherence attributable to the source itself, correcting for observational noise, the noise-levels should be subtracted from the PSDs in the denominator of Equation 11. Errors on the intrinsic coherence can be estimated using the approach outlined in Vaughan & Nowak (1997), but it is important to bear in mind that the errors on intrinsic coherence are difficult to correctly determine for low variability S/N . This problem does not affect the lag-error estimation however, since this is based on the raw coherence.…”
Section: The Coherence and Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coherence function, γ 2 ( f i ), a derivative of the norm of the cross spectrum, measures the Fourier-frequency dependent degree of linear correlation between two time series, in this case the light curves (Vaughan & Nowak 1997). An intuitive geometrical interpretation of γ 2 ( f i ) as a length of a vector sum in the complex plane can be found in Nowak et al (1999a).…”
Section: Calculation Of X-ray Timing Quantitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variance of the coherence estimator is given by the asymptotic formula (P81; Vaughan & Nowak 1997;Nowak et al 1999;Bendat & Piersol 2011) Var[γ 2…”
Section: Smoothed/averaged Cross-spectral Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%