2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray tomographical observations of cracks and voids in 3D carbon/carbon composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, experimental measurement is the most commonly used method to investigate the effective mechanical properties of composites [9,10]. However, due to the timeconsuming and costly experimental tests [11], analytical calculation and numerical simulation are at least regarded as an alternative. To date, the analytical models have achieved much progress in investigating the mechanical behaviors of composites [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally, experimental measurement is the most commonly used method to investigate the effective mechanical properties of composites [9,10]. However, due to the timeconsuming and costly experimental tests [11], analytical calculation and numerical simulation are at least regarded as an alternative. To date, the analytical models have achieved much progress in investigating the mechanical behaviors of composites [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the accurate predictions of the effective mechanical properties of C/C composites with the reasonable computational efficiency, the microstructures of C/C composites should be characterized appropriately. Up to now, extensive techniques have been successfully used to obtain the microstructure of composites, such as scanning electron microscope (SEM) [21], micro CT [11] and Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP) [22,23]. Compared with the complex data obtained from micro CT test [24] and only 2D information got from SEM, MIP technique can provide both the distribution of the pore radius and the pore volume [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its main advantages include the non-destructive nature, multi-length scale resolutions and wide applicability to many solid materials [1]. Most of the existing XCT studies are restricted to the reconstruction of 3D internal microstructures of various materials [2][3][4][5][6] without loading. Recently, some in-situ XCT tests, by integrating a loading rig during the scan were carried out to investigate the internal 3D damage and fracture evolution in some materials, examples Limodin et al [7] in nodular graphite cast iron, Bay et al [8] in bones, Brault et al [9] in laminated composites, and Mostafavi et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to SEM, X-ray computed tomography (XCT) is a nondestructive 3D technique capable of resolving internal structure with micron resolutions, and does not require tedious sample preparation. With XCT, void shape and size distributions, and interface structures can be revealed [9][10][11][12][13]. The synchrotron micro CT has been utilized to characterize the epoxy composites [10,12,13], 3D C/C [9] and 3D C/SiC [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%