X-ray spectra and gamma factors from 70 to 120 kV X-ray tube voltages

Campillo-Rivera, Guillermo Eduardo; Torres-Cortés, Carina Oliva; Vazquez-Bañuelos, Joel; García-Reyna, Mayra Guadalupe; Marquez-Mata, Claudia Angelica; Vasquez-Arteaga, Marcial; Vega‐Carrillo, Héctor René

doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109437

Cited by 12 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Tools The research used in this research is an X-ray machine, CR, Imaging Plate (IP), CR scanner, 21-step stepwedge with an additional 1.5 mm thickness for each step, and software program RadiAnt DICOM VIEWER 2020.1 (64 bit). Before conducting the research, the X-ray machine was turned on and a warm-up procedure was carried out with the collimator facing the examination table (Afifi et al, 2020;Campillo-Rivera et al, 2021). The stepwedge is positioned in the middle of the CR cassette by adjusting the collimation to the size of the stepwedge, where the thickest part is placed in the cathode direction and the thinnest part is placed in the anode direction for AHE application (Dahlan, 2011).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of anode heel effect (AHE) with stepwedge and variation of x-ray tube voltage to contrast to noise ratio (CNR) in computed radiography (CR)

Ratini,

Yuliara,

Baskoro

2023

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A study has been carried out on the application of anode heel effect (AHE) with stepwedge to variations in X-ray tube voltage on contrast to noise ratio (CNR) on computed radiography (CR) images. Stepwedge used with 21 steps with the addition of a thickness of 1.5 mm each step. X-ray tube voltage variations are 40kV, 50 kV, 60 kV, 70 kV, 80 kV, and 90 kV. Analysis of the variation of the X-ray tube voltage on the CNR value was determined using IMB SPSS Statistics 26 with a simple regression test. The results of these tests indicate that the variation of the X-ray tube voltage affects the CNR value, where the greater the variation of the X-ray tube voltage, the lower the CNR value. The CNR value at a thickness of 27.0 mm is the optimal CNR value of 71.113

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of anode heel effect (AHE) with stepwedge and variation of x-ray tube voltage to contrast to noise ratio (CNR) in computed radiography (CR)

Ratini,

Yuliara,

Baskoro

2023

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Numerous factors influence the quality of images produced by digital X-ray radiography techniques. Notable amongst these factors are the setup used, the energy level (kilovoltage kV) [27,28], the tube current (mA), the exposure time [29], and the focal spot size of the X-ray tube used for acquisition [30]. Additionally, the detector properties, the calibration procedure, and the material properties of the inspected component could also affect the quality of acquired images.…”

Section: Radiographic Image Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Deep Learning Neural Network Performance on NDT Digital X-ray Radiography Images: Analyzing the Impact of Image Quality Parameters—An Experimental Study

Hena

Wei

Ibarra-Castanedo

et al. 2023

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In response to the growing inspection demand exerted by process automation in component manufacturing, non-destructive testing (NDT) continues to explore automated approaches that utilize deep-learning algorithms for defect identification, including within digital X-ray radiography images. This necessitates a thorough understanding of the implication of image quality parameters on the performance of these deep-learning models. This study investigated the influence of two image-quality parameters, namely signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), on the performance of a U-net deep-learning semantic segmentation model. Input images were acquired with varying combinations of exposure factors, such as kilovoltage, milli-ampere, and exposure time, which altered the resultant radiographic image quality. The data were sorted into five different datasets according to their measured SNR and CNR values. The deep-learning model was trained five distinct times, utilizing a unique dataset for each training session. Training the model with high CNR values yielded an intersection-over-union (IoU) metric of 0.9594 on test data of the same category but dropped to 0.5875 when tested on lower CNR test data. The result of this study emphasizes the importance of achieving a balance in training dataset according to the investigated quality parameters in order to enhance the performance of deep-learning segmentation models for NDT digital X-ray radiography applications.

show abstract

“…Numerous factors influence the quality of images produced by digital X-ray radiography techniques. Notable amongst these factors are the setup used, energy level (kilovoltage kV) [28,29], the tube current (mA), the exposure time [30], and focal spot size of the X-ray tube used for acquisition [31]. Additionally, detector properties, calibration procedure and the material properties of the inspected component could also affect the quality of acquired images.…”

Section: Radiographic Image Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Deep Learning Neural Network Performance on NDT Digital X-ray Radiography Images: Analyzing the Impact of Image Quality Parameters - An Experimental Study

Hena¹,

Wei²,

Ibarra-Castanedo³

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In response to the growing inspection demand exerted by process automation in component manufacturing, Non-destructive testing (NDT) continues to explore automated approaches that utilize deep learning algorithms for defect identification, including within digital X-ray radiography images. This necessitates a thorough understanding of the implication of image quality parameters on the performance of these deep learning models. This study investigates the influence of two image quality parameters, namely Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR), on the performance of U-net deep learning segmentation model. Input images were acquired with varying combinations of exposure factors such as kilovoltage, milli-ampere, and exposure time, which altered the resultant quality. The data was sorted into 5 different datasets according to their measured SNR and CNR values. The deep learning model was trained 5 distinct times, utilizing a unique dataset for each training session. Training the model with high CNR values yielded an intersection over Union (IoU) metric of 0.9594 on test data of the same category but drops to 0.5875 when tested on lower CNR test data. The result in this study emphasizes the importance of achieving a balance in training dataset according to the investigated quality parameters, to enhance the performance of deep learning segmentation models in NDT radiography applications.

show abstract

X-ray spectra and gamma factors from 70 to 120 kV X-ray tube voltages

Cited by 12 publications

References 38 publications

Application of anode heel effect (AHE) with stepwedge and variation of x-ray tube voltage to contrast to noise ratio (CNR) in computed radiography (CR)

Application of anode heel effect (AHE) with stepwedge and variation of x-ray tube voltage to contrast to noise ratio (CNR) in computed radiography (CR)

Deep Learning Neural Network Performance on NDT Digital X-ray Radiography Images: Analyzing the Impact of Image Quality Parameters—An Experimental Study

Deep Learning Neural Network Performance on NDT Digital X-ray Radiography Images: Analyzing the Impact of Image Quality Parameters - An Experimental Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About