2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac978f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-Ray Reverberation Mapping of Ark 564 Using Gaussian Process Regression

Abstract: Ark 564 is an extreme high-Eddington narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy, known for being one of the brightest, most rapidly variable soft X-ray active galactic nuclei (AGN), and for having one of the lowest temperature coronae. Here, we present a 410 ks NuSTAR observation and two 115 ks XMM-Newton observations of this unique source, which reveal a very strong, relativistically broadened iron line. We compute the Fourier-resolved time lags by first using Gaussian processes to interpolate the NuSTAR gaps, implementing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in kernel form for modeling only these two bands could result from the higher signal-to-noise in these two bands as shown in Figure 1. These results are generally consistent with previous kernel comparisons for modeling AGN variability, as Wilkins (2019), Griffiths et al (2021), and Lewin et al (2022) all find the RQ and Matérn-1 2 kernels to perform statistically similar. Similar to the three aforementioned works, we find the SE kernel provides the poorest description of the observed light curves.…”
Section: Selecting the Kernel Functionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The difference in kernel form for modeling only these two bands could result from the higher signal-to-noise in these two bands as shown in Figure 1. These results are generally consistent with previous kernel comparisons for modeling AGN variability, as Wilkins (2019), Griffiths et al (2021), and Lewin et al (2022) all find the RQ and Matérn-1 2 kernels to perform statistically similar. Similar to the three aforementioned works, we find the SE kernel provides the poorest description of the observed light curves.…”
Section: Selecting the Kernel Functionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…One must assume the data are normally distributed as well as a functional form for the kernel function, which we discuss in the following Sections (3.1 and 3.2, respectively). The choice of kernel function form has been found to impact the significance of lag recovery depending on the data sampling rate (Griffiths et al 2021;Lewin et al 2022). Each functional form has its own set of hyperparameters θ, each encoding a different aspect of the variability, such as length scales (timescales, in our case), amplitudes, etc.…”
Section: Fourier-resolved Timing Using Gpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations