2013
DOI: 10.1615/atomizspr.2013008340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-Ray Radiography Measurements of Cavitating Nozzle Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…provide vapour fraction data for the timeaveraged extent of cavitation in an injector-replica orifice. In-nozzle sheet cavitation has been quantified by Duke et al (2013), which, however, used an interpolation technique to compensate for the small dimensions (5×6 µm) of the monochromatic beam employed.Xray Phase Contrast Imaging (XPCI) has been, until now, primarily performed to resolve the velocity field and turbulence level of spray flows produced by real-size fuel injectors (Im et al 2013;Moon 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…provide vapour fraction data for the timeaveraged extent of cavitation in an injector-replica orifice. In-nozzle sheet cavitation has been quantified by Duke et al (2013), which, however, used an interpolation technique to compensate for the small dimensions (5×6 µm) of the monochromatic beam employed.Xray Phase Contrast Imaging (XPCI) has been, until now, primarily performed to resolve the velocity field and turbulence level of spray flows produced by real-size fuel injectors (Im et al 2013;Moon 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, synchrotron X-ray sources provide a far greater degree of brilliance than laboratory-scale sources, permitting a much greater scope for advanced X-ray diagnostics. Synchrotron sources have existed for many years, but have until recently found relatively little usage by the fuel injection community (Duke et al 2013(Duke et al , 2014(Duke et al , 2015aKastengren et al 2012;Moon et al 2015;Powell et al 2000;Wang et al 2008). Nevertheless, laboratory-scale X-ray sources have improved characteristics in recent years, featuring small spot-sizes, which if coupled with developments in detector technology, provide adequate spatial resolution for multiphase flow applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such problems are overcome by the use of focused synchrotron X-rays that offer an advantageous combination of temporal and spatial resolution due to high photon flux; however, the main drawback is the limitation of focus in a relatively small area (Duke et al 2013). Nevertheless, relevant studies have been performed in Battistoni et al (2015) and Duke et al (2013Duke et al ( , 2014Duke et al ( , 2015b, where multiphase flow inside a cavitating channel has been studied and compared to computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results. Researchers performed an X-ray radiography experiment on a model nozzle of 500 μm in diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantitatively measure the local void fractions in cavitating flows, X‐ray radiography was employed in recent years . Standard X‐rays were used to examine a cavitating flow and consequently gather some quantitative information about the void fraction .…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%