2005
DOI: 10.1086/496966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X‐Ray Processing of ChaMPlane Fields: Methods and Initial Results for Selected Anti–Galactic Center Fields

Abstract: We describe the X-ray analysis procedure of the on-going Chandra Multiwavelength Plane (ChaMPlane) survey and report the initial results from the analysis of 15 selected anti-Galactic center observations (90 • < l < 270 • ). We describe the X-ray analysis procedures for ChaMPlane using custom-developed analysis tools appropriate for Galactic sources but also of general use: optimum photometry in crowded fields using advanced techniques for overlapping sources, rigorous astrometry and 95% error circles for comb… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
129
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only three of the 22 X-ray counterparts lie farther than the Hong et al (2005) 95% error circle from the radio position, suggesting that most of the X-ray counterparts are correct counterparts. Two of the three counterparts which are farther than expected from their radio positions (R and L) lie in the wings (1.5" and 2.6" distance, respectively) of brighter sources, which is likely to affect their estimated X-ray positions.…”
Section: Astrometric Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Only three of the 22 X-ray counterparts lie farther than the Hong et al (2005) 95% error circle from the radio position, suggesting that most of the X-ray counterparts are correct counterparts. Two of the three counterparts which are farther than expected from their radio positions (R and L) lie in the wings (1.5" and 2.6" distance, respectively) of brighter sources, which is likely to affect their estimated X-ray positions.…”
Section: Astrometric Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…5 from Hong et al (2005), which gives the 95% confidence radius on the wavdetect position, P err . The wavdetect routine provides us with the source positions, but is not optimised to measure source counts.…”
Section: X-ray Source Detection and Source Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source detection was performed with the wavdetect algorithm, on images extracted in three energy bands (Bx = 0.3-8 keV, Sx = 0.3-2.5 keV, and Hx = 2.5-8 keV) at spatial scales of 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 pixels. X-ray source properties were measured using the aperture photometry procedure described by Hong et al (2005), which accounts for neighboring sources with overlapping source or background regions. The full position-dependent instrument sensitivity is accounted for by application of the exposure maps and response matrices (RMFs and ARFs) generated by the ChaMP pipeline.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full position-dependent instrument sensitivity is accounted for by application of the exposure maps and response matrices (RMFs and ARFs) generated by the ChaMP pipeline. Positional error circles are assigned to each source based on net counts and distance from the aim point, according to the standard model of Hong et al (2005) which is based on detailed simulations of the full Chandra optical path and ACIS characteristics. Source detection and photometry were performed both on the individual exposures in Table 1 and the complete stacked data set for each field.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation