2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic and morphologic studies of Ru nanoparticles deposited onto highly oriented pyrolytic graphite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A band at 1760 cm -1 was assigned to be the C-O stretching vibrations of the COOH groups and the band at 1600 cm -1 would be considered to be the vibration of C (Aleksandrzak et al 2015). A weak peak located at 1350 cm -1 was assigned to be the OH bending of the C-OH groups (Bavand et al 2015). A strong band at 1100 cm -1 might be attributed to C-O stretching vibration (Chang et al 2015;Singh et al 2015).…”
Section: Ftir Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A band at 1760 cm -1 was assigned to be the C-O stretching vibrations of the COOH groups and the band at 1600 cm -1 would be considered to be the vibration of C (Aleksandrzak et al 2015). A weak peak located at 1350 cm -1 was assigned to be the OH bending of the C-OH groups (Bavand et al 2015). A strong band at 1100 cm -1 might be attributed to C-O stretching vibration (Chang et al 2015;Singh et al 2015).…”
Section: Ftir Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristic peak has been deconvoluted into five components for best fitting parameter of R 2 value 0.999 using Gaussian multipeak fitting technique. The characteristic peak for Ru 3d 5/2 and 3d 3/2 was observed at 282.2 eV and 283.9 eV respectively indicating the presence of Ru . Since the C1 s reference peak also lies at 285 eV it overlaps with the Ru peak and somehow it reflects a little bit shifts in the deconvoluted data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since the C1 s reference peak also lies at 285 eV it overlaps with the Ru peak and somehow it reflects a little bit shifts in the deconvoluted data. The appearance of 3d 5/2 peak at 282.2 eV is indicating Ru−N species in +3 oxidation state . The 286.5 eV peak attributed to the Ru−C species adjacent to carboxyl and 287.6 eV corresponds to the electron deficient carbon atom within the carboxyl …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…461.2 eV, while RuO 2 has characteristic peaks at 462.6 eV and 464.0 eV ,. No ruthenium species has been identified with a characteristic peak at 463.1 eV, so this peak shift has been tentatively assigned as either a shift from RuO 2 after activation to Ru(0) after reaction, or merely a shift in the RuO 2 peak with no change in oxidation state . In fresh Ru,Fe@NCNT the peak is observed at 459.2 eV in the Ru,Fe@NCNT‐0.05/0.95 sample, and at 461.8 eV in the Ru,Fe@NCNT‐0.2/1.0 sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fresh Ru,Fe@NCNT the peak is observed at 459.2 eV in the Ru,Fe@NCNT‐0.05/0.95 sample, and at 461.8 eV in the Ru,Fe@NCNT‐0.2/1.0 sample. These peaks are both attributed to either Ru(0) or Ru carbide, as the CVD‐doped ruthenium is likely incorporated directly into the NCNT support structure, similar to the Fe nanoparticles. In the absence of characteristic peak positions, these assignments are justified by the oxygen‐free CVD synthesis environment, in which the formation of Ru oxides in the fresh samples is significantly less likely than the formation of Ru(0) or Ru carbides as the particles are formed and similarly covered with a graphitic carbon layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%