1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4596(80)90543-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray photoelectron spectra of 3d transition metal pyrites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

18
96
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
18
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When going from Co͑S 2 ͒ 2− to Ni͑S 2 ͒ 2− the binding energy of the S 2p core level is increased by 0.1 eV. 19 This fact supports the above conclusion that particularly the interplay between the transition-metal and sulfur atoms is responsible for the observed BE variation. In CoS with a S 2− configuration the S 2p PE signal is found at 161.8 eV binding energy.…”
Section: Core-level Photoemissionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When going from Co͑S 2 ͒ 2− to Ni͑S 2 ͒ 2− the binding energy of the S 2p core level is increased by 0.1 eV. 19 This fact supports the above conclusion that particularly the interplay between the transition-metal and sulfur atoms is responsible for the observed BE variation. In CoS with a S 2− configuration the S 2p PE signal is found at 161.8 eV binding energy.…”
Section: Core-level Photoemissionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This value is close to the ones observed in CoS 2 ͑778.1 eV͒ and CoSe 2 ͑778.3 eV͒, and would support a Co 2+ valence state. 19 In the cobalt lower valent CoSe compound, the Co 2p 3/2 binding energy is 778.7 eV. 22 However, the length of Co-S bonds in Co 3 Sn 2 S 2 indi- cates covalency.…”
Section: Core-level Photoemissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The doublet 707.2/720.0 eV is correlated with the iron disulphide species. The shoulder on the high-energy side of the F e 2~~;~ signal is not due to iron oxidation by oxygen but is a secondary maxima of the Fe2p3,> state [18]. We do not find evidence for a Fe2p signal imputable to the FeS species.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The X-ray photoelectron spectrum (XPS) of the CoSe 2 nanocrystals shows peaks at 778.7 and 54.4 eV, corresponding to the binding energies of the cobalt 2p 3/2 and selenium 3d 5/2 states. [14] In addition, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis indicates that the ratio of Co:Se in the sample is approximately 1:1.80, which suggests that other cobalt selenide phases (for example, CoSe and Co 3 Se 4 ) may be present in small amounts. [15] Additional TEM analysis of the dispersion of cobalt nanocrystals prior to the addition of selenium showed that the cobalt nanocrystals assemble into wires (see Supporting Information), which are similar to the assemblies of hollow CoSe 2 nanocrystals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%