1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf01360893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray photoelectron emission from iron metal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No deviation between the two calibration methods was found (within the error of the measurement). We therefore believe that the deviation is due to an upward shift of the theoretical DOS, as previously reported in the case of Fe . The various parameters used to adjust the theoretical DOS are outlined in Table S1 of the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…No deviation between the two calibration methods was found (within the error of the measurement). We therefore believe that the deviation is due to an upward shift of the theoretical DOS, as previously reported in the case of Fe . The various parameters used to adjust the theoretical DOS are outlined in Table S1 of the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…On the other hand, the TPR profiles of the fresh catalysts confirms the presence of only one oxidized species (Fe3O4, [53]) that can be reduced at around 600 ⁰C (see figure S4). Analysis of the surface of the different catalysts after 50 h on stream by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) at the Fe2p level reveals in most cases the following contributions: a first peak of the spectra at 706.9 eV corresponding to metallic iron [54], a second peak at 707.9 eV characteristic of iron carbides [55], two subsequent peaks at 710.6 and 712.6 eV corresponding to Fe(II) and Fe(III) 2p3/2 respectively, a group of satellite peaks around 719 eV, two additional peaks at 723.9 and 725.6 eV arising from Fe(II) and Fe (III) 2p1/2 [25,56] and, finally, the Fe 2p1/2 shake-up around 733.4 eV(see figure 3.b). To address the evolution of iron species, additional XPS measurements at the Fe2p level were carried out in the fresh Fe/C+K sample (see figure S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar fashion, another two peaks, labeled c and d, representing photoelectron emission arising from Fe 3d and Fe 4s valence electrons, are required to deconvolute the Fe valence band peaks, as shown in the upper plot of Figure ; these are the principal components contributing to the spectrum and have been variously attributed. The relative Fe:C intensity ratios in the valence band spectra are presented in Figure ; this ratio is independent of deposition rate, which agrees well with the behavior of the core level spectra shown in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%