2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray outbursts from a new transient in NGC 55

Abstract: We report the outbursts from a newly discovered X-ray transient in the Magellanictype, SB(s)m galaxy NGC 55. The transient source, XMMU J001446.81-391123.48, was undetectable in the 2001 XMM-Newton and 2004 Chandra observations, but detected in a 2010 XMM-Newton observation at a significance level of 9σ in the 0.3-8 keV energy band. The XMM-Newton spectrum is consistent with a power law with photon index Γ = 3.17 +0.22 −0.20 , but is better fit with a kT in = 0.70 ± 0.06 keV disk blackbody. The luminosity was … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, left) produced with the online tool (Evans et al 2007) 3 . The Swift/XRT monitoring confirms the strong long-term variability and underlines the presence of multiple high-flux states as previously suggested by Jithesh & Wang (2015). In Fig.…”
Section: Long-term Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3, left) produced with the online tool (Evans et al 2007) 3 . The Swift/XRT monitoring confirms the strong long-term variability and underlines the presence of multiple high-flux states as previously suggested by Jithesh & Wang (2015). In Fig.…”
Section: Long-term Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We requested new observations to follow up ULX-1 and search for any new transients or strong variability in the other bright X-ray binaries in the NGC 55 galaxy. Among them, XMMU J001446.81-391123 in the past showed the most remarkable variability (Jithesh & Wang 2015. Considering the transient nature of some ULXs, the newly discovered ones are not always necessarily "new" sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation