2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-007-9547-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray observations of ultraluminous X-ray sources

Abstract: Ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) are amongst the most intriguing of X-ray source classes. Their extreme luminosities -greater than 10 39 erg s −1 in the 0.3 -10 keV band alone -suggest either the presence of black holes larger than those regularly encountered in our own Galaxy (the Galactic centre excepted), or sources apparently radiating well above the Eddington limit. We review the insights afforded us by studies of their X-ray emission, focussing on what this reveals about the underlying compact object. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

10
187
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
10
187
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decade it has been proposed that a substantial fraction of the population of ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) and ultraluminous supersoft sources (ULSs) are powered by super-Eddington accretion onto compact objects such as neutron stars and black holes (see, e.g., King et al 2001, Roberts 2007, Urquhart and Soria 2016, Feng et al 2016, and references therein). In particular, ULSs could be a category of ULXs observed at high inclination angles, possibly edge on, where a thick layer of material is obscuring the innermost hard X-ray emitting regions (e.g., Kylafis &Xilouris 1993 andPoutanen et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade it has been proposed that a substantial fraction of the population of ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) and ultraluminous supersoft sources (ULSs) are powered by super-Eddington accretion onto compact objects such as neutron stars and black holes (see, e.g., King et al 2001, Roberts 2007, Urquhart and Soria 2016, Feng et al 2016, and references therein). In particular, ULSs could be a category of ULXs observed at high inclination angles, possibly edge on, where a thick layer of material is obscuring the innermost hard X-ray emitting regions (e.g., Kylafis &Xilouris 1993 andPoutanen et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a number of other ULXs showed similar degeneracies between spectral shape, luminosity and short-term variability when comparing low and highquality data, and it has been proposed that these ULXs may be sMBHs or massive stellar BHs accreting at super-Eddington rates (e.g. Stobbart et al 2006;Roberts 2007;Gladstone et al 2009;Heil et al 2009;Middleton et al 2011;Sutton et al 2013b;Pintore et al 2014;Middleton et al 2015). If the power-law-dominated spectra of NGC 5643 ULX1 are indeed simply due to the poor data quality and the intrinsic spectra are actually similar to the highest quality observation, then the marginally different levels of short-term variability could be explained by the effects of an outflow ejected by the accretion disc at radii where it is locally super-Eddington (Poutanen et al 2007;Ohsuga & Mineshige 2011;Takeuchi et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these features are not commonly observed in Galactic XRBs, they imply a new spectral regime, which is usually referred to as the 'ultraluminous state' (Roberts 2007;Gladstone et al 2009), and may be associated with super-Eddington accretion. A few luminous ULXs have very recently been observed with NuSTAR, resulting in spectra which demonstrate that the highenergy curvature persists above 10 keV (Bachetti et al 2013;Walton et al 2013a;Rana et al 2015), confirming this result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ULXs were universally considered to be accreting black holes, most likely ∼ 10 M⊙ ones in a binary with a high-mass companion, with some sources possibly harbouring "intermediate mass" ∼ 10 2−3 M⊙ black holes (King et al 2001;Roberts 2007). Their high luminosity was thought to imply that if the X-ray source is of typical stellar mass, the emission should be beamed, perhaps in an accretion funnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%