2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-098259-5.00005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray Identification of Mixed-Layer Structures: Modelling of Diffraction Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to further support this interpretation and to provide some quantitative data on the coexistence of hydrated and collapsed layers within the same structures, XRD profile modeling is required based on the physical description of the distribution of layers in crystals using Markovian statistics. 30,69 This method was applied on three selected samples, i.e., the two endmembers Cs-Sap-0.8 and Cs-Sap- (Figure 7a). Such combination leads to an overall 2W/1W/0W layer content of 14/74/12.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to further support this interpretation and to provide some quantitative data on the coexistence of hydrated and collapsed layers within the same structures, XRD profile modeling is required based on the physical description of the distribution of layers in crystals using Markovian statistics. 30,69 This method was applied on three selected samples, i.e., the two endmembers Cs-Sap-0.8 and Cs-Sap- (Figure 7a). Such combination leads to an overall 2W/1W/0W layer content of 14/74/12.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 The layer-to-layer distance was allowed to deviate from its mean value by introducing a variance parameter  z , that was 0.05, 0.14 and 0.10 Å for samples Cs-Sap-0.8, Cs-Sap-1.2 and Cs-Sap-2.0, respectively, to account for this "disorder of the second type". 29,30 The z-coordinates for all atoms within the 2:1 layer framework were set as proposed by Moore and Reynolds. 27 The interlayer configuration used for bihydrated layers (2W, d 001~1 4.5 Å) was initially proposed by Ferrage et al 29 19,31,32 The fitting procedure is detailed elsewhere.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction Profile Modeling Of 00ℓ Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in Materials Science and Engineering in [41] and detailed later in [42]. e abundances of the diverse layer types (W i ), the mode of stacking of the di erent kinds of layers, and the mean number of layers per coherent scattering domain (CSD) are determined through XRD pro le modeling.…”
Section: Quantitative Xrd Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed analysis of Toarcian shale samples from the Tournemire site (France) revealed minor differences between the illiteesmectite (I-Sm) mixed-layered mineral composition of preserved and oxidized samples, the latter being slightly enriched in Sm layer (Charpentier et al, 2004). The results rely on X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern deconvolution, and more advanced analytical identification such as multispecimen methods (Lanson et al, 2009;Sakharov and Lanson, 2013) might be used to unambiguously confirm this point. Electron energy-loss spectroscopy measurements indicate an increase in the Fe(III)/total Fe ratio of I-Sm particles.…”
Section: Perturbing the Physicochemical Conditions In The Subsurface:mentioning
confidence: 89%