2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray fluorescence analysis of milk and dairy products: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the benefits of using XRF compared to AAS or ICP-OES rely on sample preparation, as direct analysis of samples (in all forms, e.g., solid, liquid, and gel) can be carried out in a concise time frame of analysis (∼60 s) without requiring organic solvents or acids (Pashkova, Aisueva, et al, 2018). Therefore, it can be easily applied for fast in-line mineral profile analysis of milk and dairy products (mainly powders), with values very consistent with those reported in the literature using different methods (Table 1) (W. P. McCarthy et al, 2020;Pashkova, 2009;Pashkova et al, 2016;Pashkova, Aisueva, et al, 2018;Pashkova, Smagunova, et al, 2018). For example, Perring and Tschopp ( 2019) established and validated a rapid method for quantifying the total ash content of 69 different powder milk-based ingredients using Energy Dispersive-X-Ray Fluorescence (ED-XFR).…”
Section: X-ray Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…However, the benefits of using XRF compared to AAS or ICP-OES rely on sample preparation, as direct analysis of samples (in all forms, e.g., solid, liquid, and gel) can be carried out in a concise time frame of analysis (∼60 s) without requiring organic solvents or acids (Pashkova, Aisueva, et al, 2018). Therefore, it can be easily applied for fast in-line mineral profile analysis of milk and dairy products (mainly powders), with values very consistent with those reported in the literature using different methods (Table 1) (W. P. McCarthy et al, 2020;Pashkova, 2009;Pashkova et al, 2016;Pashkova, Aisueva, et al, 2018;Pashkova, Smagunova, et al, 2018). For example, Perring and Tschopp ( 2019) established and validated a rapid method for quantifying the total ash content of 69 different powder milk-based ingredients using Energy Dispersive-X-Ray Fluorescence (ED-XFR).…”
Section: X-ray Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Serious overdose of pesticide residues can cause acute intoxication, while mild pesticide residues chronically accumulated in human body can also cause many chronic diseases. At present, the widely used methods for pesticide residue detection are liquid chromatography [43], gas chromatography mass spectroscopy [44] and fluorescence analysis [45]. The accuracy of these methods is very high, but the pretreatment processes are very tedious, which is difficult to meet the rapid and on-spot detection in fruit and vegetables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the WD system, the emitted polychromatic beam emerging from the sample surface is dispersed into its monochromatic components (wavelengths) with an analyzing crystal, whereas the ED approach measures the intensity of the photon energy of the individual X-rays generated. It is well accepted that WD-XRF has superior sensitivity (LOD of 8.0 mg kg -1 vs 1 mg kg -1 of ED-XRF) and resolution, fewer spectral overlaps and lower background intensities (Pashkova et al, 2018). Anyway, the WD-XRF configuration is reported to be less employed in milk and dairy product analysis due to the higher price compared with ED-XRF (Habib-Ur-Rehman, Rehana & Yawar, 2012).…”
Section: Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%