1982
DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(82)90252-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray diffraction study of protactinium metal to 53 GPa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are in agreement with the findings from the earlier experimental study by Benedict et al 25 that the bct structure of protactinium is the stable structure up to at least 53 GPa, the highest pressure reached in that work. We determined further that the Pa-I form is stable up to ϳ77 GPa, which accounts for the fact that the Pa-II phase was not observed in the earlier study.…”
Section: A Pa-i Structuresupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We are in agreement with the findings from the earlier experimental study by Benedict et al 25 that the bct structure of protactinium is the stable structure up to at least 53 GPa, the highest pressure reached in that work. We determined further that the Pa-I form is stable up to ϳ77 GPa, which accounts for the fact that the Pa-II phase was not observed in the earlier study.…”
Section: A Pa-i Structuresupporting
confidence: 94%
“…1 This was observed in comparing our protactinium values with those previously reported. 25 We believe that our modulus for protactinium metal is a more realistic value. We shall not dwell on the specific aspects for the differences in values reported previously for the modulus or its derivative, but note that nonhydrostatic experimental conditions ͑i.e., the solidification of the transmitting media, especially in the critical, lower pressure segments of the compression data͒ can lead to significant errors.…”
Section: Rietveld Analyses Of Datamentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The calculated energies for each combination were then fitted with either a cubic function of the volume or a second-order Birch fit, 19 to obtain the zero-pressure volume (V 0 ) and bulk modulus (B 0 ). The fitted results are compared with previous calculations [3][4][5] and experiment [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] in Tables I and II. We have performed these calculations in both the fcc ͑Pearson cF4͒ and experimentally determined ␣ structures, in order to determine to what extent the cubic close-packed structure can serve as a surrogate for the more complex ͑and much more computationally demanding͒ ␣ structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%