2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2016.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray diffraction data-assisted structure searches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This package is extremely popular and has been interfaced to a number of local structural optimization codes (VASP, QE, GULP, SIESTA, CP2K CASTEP) varying from highly accurate DFT methods to fast semiempirical approaches that can deal with large systems. Notably this PSObased algorithm [286,287,288,289] combined with a fingerprint and matrix bond analysis has been successfully used in solving numerous structural problems [290,291,292,293,294], including prediction of new high-pressure superconducting hydrides [295,182,296,297].…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This package is extremely popular and has been interfaced to a number of local structural optimization codes (VASP, QE, GULP, SIESTA, CP2K CASTEP) varying from highly accurate DFT methods to fast semiempirical approaches that can deal with large systems. Notably this PSObased algorithm [286,287,288,289] combined with a fingerprint and matrix bond analysis has been successfully used in solving numerous structural problems [290,291,292,293,294], including prediction of new high-pressure superconducting hydrides [295,182,296,297].…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods including simulated annealing, genetic algorithms, and particle swarm have all been used to deduce the atomic positions. [12,[16][17][18][19][20] While these approaches have been shown to be effective in solving a wide range of crystal structures across chemistries, many rely on the specification of an expected structure or atomic building blocks such as oxygen tetrahedra or prototype structures to reduce the free parameters as much as possible. [16][17][18][19][20] In some cases, these heuristics can introduce a barrier by limiting relevant degrees of freedom or a bias by way of structure sampling which can influence the structure solution technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12,[16][17][18][19][20] While these approaches have been shown to be effective in solving a wide range of crystal structures across chemistries, many rely on the specification of an expected structure or atomic building blocks such as oxygen tetrahedra or prototype structures to reduce the free parameters as much as possible. [16][17][18][19][20] In some cases, these heuristics can introduce a barrier by limiting relevant degrees of freedom or a bias by way of structure sampling which can influence the structure solution technique. In addition, this task may be especially difficult in less common chemical systems such as sulfides and nitrides, which are becoming fertile grounds for materials discovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach has been pursued before in the experimental community. Direct space methods [14] and data-assisted structure searches [15] have been used to optimize the atomic configuration so that experimental diffraction data is reproduced. There have been attempts to use an additional energy cost function to support efficient fitting; however, this has included the assumption that the observed data is sufficiently accurate [16][17][18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%