2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray CT and hydraulic evidence for a relationship between fracture conductivity and adjacent matrix porosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the missing appropriate validation experiments and the negligible matrix flow, possible fracture-matrix interaction is not further discussed in this study and can be considered as uninfluential artifacts of the matrix material. Nevertheless, the MSMA method can provide a promising approach to simulate such issues, especially considering laminated sandstones, which were experimentally investigated in the past (Clavaud et al, 2008;Grader et al, 2013;Karpyn et al, 2009). Indeed, this method can be erroneous for heterogeneous rocks such as granite, but Watanabe et al (2011) found that affectations of locally resulting non-real apertures in the matrix are marginal.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the missing appropriate validation experiments and the negligible matrix flow, possible fracture-matrix interaction is not further discussed in this study and can be considered as uninfluential artifacts of the matrix material. Nevertheless, the MSMA method can provide a promising approach to simulate such issues, especially considering laminated sandstones, which were experimentally investigated in the past (Clavaud et al, 2008;Grader et al, 2013;Karpyn et al, 2009). Indeed, this method can be erroneous for heterogeneous rocks such as granite, but Watanabe et al (2011) found that affectations of locally resulting non-real apertures in the matrix are marginal.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of destructive techniques have previously been used to evaluate the roughness of natural fractures in rock, including measurements using stylus profilemeters [7,20] and surface laser scanning [11,12,21,22]. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging [4,23] and CT scanning [24][25][26][27][28] are two methods that have been used to obtain detailed fracture geometries without destroying the original sample. All of these methods have shown that fractures are complex, and many have shown that the fracture structure is well described by fractal geometry [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate the missing attenuation due to the presence of a fracture; data cropping, classification, and identification of fracture features are needed (Karpyn, 2009);. The missing attenuation is calculated using Eq.…”
Section: Methods For Measuring Fracture Aperture Using Ct Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%