1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf01283347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray analysis of solid solutions of ferric oxide in mullite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information on the maximum amount of oxide which may dissolve in the mullite at a certain temperature is contradictory, not only from different authors but also within the work of the same authors carried out in different years [4,5,7,8]. According to [5] the maximum solubility of titanium and iron oxides in mullite at 1400~ was 1.5 and 3%* respectively; according to [8] the same authors state that mullite dissolves 2-2.5% TiO2 at 1400~ 6% Fe203 at 1300~ and 8-9% Fe203 at 1400~ According to [7] the maximum solubility of Fe203 is 6.5% at 1450~…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Information on the maximum amount of oxide which may dissolve in the mullite at a certain temperature is contradictory, not only from different authors but also within the work of the same authors carried out in different years [4,5,7,8]. According to [5] the maximum solubility of titanium and iron oxides in mullite at 1400~ was 1.5 and 3%* respectively; according to [8] the same authors state that mullite dissolves 2-2.5% TiO2 at 1400~ 6% Fe203 at 1300~ and 8-9% Fe203 at 1400~ According to [7] the maximum solubility of Fe203 is 6.5% at 1450~…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Mullite can form a rather wide range of solid solutions with different oxides: AI~O~, Fe203, Ti02, Cr203, and B203 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, relevant data in this case are contradictory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…* The intensities for all the strongest diffraction reflections of mullite and all kinds of its composition (1.5 -< ~-< 2) were calculated f r o m the refined [9] crystallographic model of mullite, generalzed for the case of random ~t by Razumovskii et al [10]. To exclude the dependence of the m e a s u r ement results on the conditions under which the x -r a y diffraction photographs were taken, we used not the intensities but their ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%