2007
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X‐linked retinoschisis in a female with a heterozygous RS1 missense mutation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 However, females with overt CXLRS manifestations have been described. [26][27][28] X chromosome inactivation 29 and/or homozygosity 27,28 are implicated. Most recently, Gliem et al 30 reported an RS1 homozygous female with macular atrophy and paracentral ring of autofluorescence suggestive of a cone/cone-rod dystrophy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5 However, females with overt CXLRS manifestations have been described. [26][27][28] X chromosome inactivation 29 and/or homozygosity 27,28 are implicated. Most recently, Gliem et al 30 reported an RS1 homozygous female with macular atrophy and paracentral ring of autofluorescence suggestive of a cone/cone-rod dystrophy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Only 2/9 obligate carriers of XLRS had functional abnormalities in the mfERG (Kim et al, 2007). Female carriers have rarely been reported with retinal abnormalities or visual loss (Gieser and Falls, 1961; Mendoza-Londono et al, 1999; Rodriguez et al, 2005; Saldana et al, 2007; Wu et al, 1985). Retinal alterations and ERG abnormalities were variable.…”
Section: Clinical Findings Of Congenital Xlrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 In general females who are heterozygous for an RS1 mutation remain asymptomatic and have no clinical features of the condition, 28 33 although we have recently seen a young girl with the clinical features of XLRS1 and a reduced b-wave on electroretinogram (ERG). 34 The patient has an affected father and is heterozygous for his mutation with no other RS1 mutation. It is likely that she has skewed X inactivation accounting for her clinical features.…”
Section: Clinical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%