2007
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0419-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

x-dependence of the quark distribution functions in the χCQMconfig

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 1, we show the strange antiquark distribution in the kaon, according to the present model, using the initial parameterizations given by Olness et al [6] and by Dahyia and Gupta [7]. The result is close to the parameterization for the kaon considered inRef.…”
Section: P(uud) -> A{uds) -\-K(us)supporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Figure 1, we show the strange antiquark distribution in the kaon, according to the present model, using the initial parameterizations given by Olness et al [6] and by Dahyia and Gupta [7]. The result is close to the parameterization for the kaon considered inRef.…”
Section: P(uud) -> A{uds) -\-K(us)supporting
confidence: 70%
“…In the work of Dahiya and Gupta [7], no strangeness asymmetry in the constituent quarks is assumed. They have used the strangeness distribution function FIGURE 1.…”
Section: P(uud) -> A{uds) -\-K(us)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The χCQM uses the effective interaction Lagrangian approach of the strong interactions where the effective degrees of freedom are the valence quarks and the internal Goldstone bosons (GBs) which are coupled to the valence quarks [22][23][24][25]. The χCQM successfully explains the "proton spin problem" [25], magnetic moments of octet and decuplet baryons including their transitions [26], account for the violation of Gottfried Sum Rule [27] and Coleman-Glashow sum rule, hyperon β decay parameters [28], strangeness content in the nucleon [29], magnetic moments of 1 2 − octet baryon resonances [30], magnetic moments of 1 2 − and 3 2 − Λ resonances [31], charge radii [32], quadrupole moment [33], etc.. The model is successfully extended to predict the important role played by the small intrinsic charm content in the nucleon spin in the SU(4) χCQM [34] and to calculate the magnetic moment and charge radii of spin 1 2 + and spin 3 2 + charm baryons including their radiative decays [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integral of the quark distribution functions [30] incorporating the strangeness content in the χCQM are expressed as [21,26] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%