2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-chromosome inactivation in female newborns conceived by assisted reproductive technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found no evidence for difference in methylation between newborns conceived through non-ICSI IVF and natural means (p = 0.634) [17]. In a study comparing of X-inactivation in newborn placentas from 60 ICSI-conceived, 72 non-ICSI-conceived and 52 naturally conceived females, no evidence was found for a difference in DNA methylation patterns between the three groups [18].…”
contrasting
confidence: 67%
“…We found no evidence for difference in methylation between newborns conceived through non-ICSI IVF and natural means (p = 0.634) [17]. In a study comparing of X-inactivation in newborn placentas from 60 ICSI-conceived, 72 non-ICSI-conceived and 52 naturally conceived females, no evidence was found for a difference in DNA methylation patterns between the three groups [18].…”
contrasting
confidence: 67%
“…In one study, XCI patterns in cord blood samples of 30 IVF and 44 naturally conceived female infants were analyzed but XCI skewing was not found to be significantly different in the two groups [84]. In another larger study with 60 ICSI, 73 IVF and 52 naturally conceived female newborns, XCI skewing was not found to be associated with the mode of conception [85].…”
Section: Examination Of Epigenetic Change In Candidate Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete HpaII digestion of genomic DNA prior to AR gene assay was confirmed by amplification of the 5' region of the MIC2 gene (an X-linked gene that escapes X-inactivation and should be completely digested by methylation-sensitive HpaII enzyme) (Anderson and Brown, 2002;Goodfellow et al, 1988) according to a modified protocol of Wu et al (Wu et al, 2014). Both, HpaII-digested and undigested samples (4 µl) were amplified with 1X reaction buffer with 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM of each dNTP, 0.2 µM of each primer, and 0.75 U of Taq DNA Polymerase (Roche) in a total volume of 15 µl.…”
Section: X-inactivation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%