Oceans'10 Ieee Sydney 2010
DOI: 10.1109/oceanssyd.2010.5603968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-Band radar derived sea surface elevation maps as input to ship motion forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact that we have compared the retrieved amplitude and phase between the 3D DFT method and our method, it is not reasonable to assess the performance only by these two parameters. On the other hand, the sea surface field based on the 3D DFT method can be reconstructed by the inverse 3D DFT on the wave spectrum or summing all the retrieved individual wave components, and the inverse 3D DFT method is more accurate than the other method [11], since the superposition of the inaccurate wave components that are extracted by a traditional dispersion relation bandpass filter [2,13] would deteriorate the reconstructed wave field. Hence, we can evaluate the performance of the retrieved wave components by the reconstructed field.…”
Section: The Simulation Of Radar Image Sequence With Random Wave Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the fact that we have compared the retrieved amplitude and phase between the 3D DFT method and our method, it is not reasonable to assess the performance only by these two parameters. On the other hand, the sea surface field based on the 3D DFT method can be reconstructed by the inverse 3D DFT on the wave spectrum or summing all the retrieved individual wave components, and the inverse 3D DFT method is more accurate than the other method [11], since the superposition of the inaccurate wave components that are extracted by a traditional dispersion relation bandpass filter [2,13] would deteriorate the reconstructed wave field. Hence, we can evaluate the performance of the retrieved wave components by the reconstructed field.…”
Section: The Simulation Of Radar Image Sequence With Random Wave Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many offshore operations like the tensioning of a tanker, cargo transfer, and helicopter landing demand a deterministic prediction of the sea surface field in real-time [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. In [13], the accurate real-time prediction of the sea surface field at the position of an operation platform is completely dependent on the retrieved sea wave components from a measured area in the vicinity of the platform [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. In our paper, the wave component denotes the individual sine or cosine waves, since the sea surface can be seen as the superposition of numerous sine or cosine wave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-The proposed feedforward controller is linear and compensates only for first-order wave loads. Recent numerical and experimental studies, for example the one of Roald et al (2013), prove that second-order wave loads have a noticeable effect on a floating turbine response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images of the wave field are obtained from the radar as radar beams are reflected and shadowed by the crests of the wave fronts. An example of this technology is the wave monitoring system WaMoS II presented in Ziemer and Dittmer (1994) and at the base of the real-time wave-prediction system developed within the On board Wave and Motion Estimator (OWME) Reichert et al (2010). In Naaijen and Wijaya (2014) a methodology based on 2D-FFT is proposed to obtain a directional phase-resolved prediction of the wave elevation from radar data (additional information about the directional energy spectrum is required, e.g.…”
Section: Wave Measurement and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%