1957
DOI: 10.1144/transglas.22.2.169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X.— The Mode of Life of Certain Goniatites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is concluded that the only effective way of accomplishing this was to have removed liquid from its camerae. Revised calculations on the densities of other ammonoids previously published by Trueman ( 1941) and Currie (1957) suggest that in all cases significant quantities of water would have been required in the camerae of these shells if they assumed neutral buoyancy. However, the reliability of the results of the calculations remains in doubt at present due to a lack of knowledge of the amount of shell material lost during diagenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is concluded that the only effective way of accomplishing this was to have removed liquid from its camerae. Revised calculations on the densities of other ammonoids previously published by Trueman ( 1941) and Currie (1957) suggest that in all cases significant quantities of water would have been required in the camerae of these shells if they assumed neutral buoyancy. However, the reliability of the results of the calculations remains in doubt at present due to a lack of knowledge of the amount of shell material lost during diagenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Buoyancy calculations on other ammonoids Trueman (1941) and Currie (1957) have obtained data on the shells of ammonites and goniatites; from these they calculate the densities of the animals in life. These calculations are now known to be inaccurate due to their using incorrect values for the density of soft tissues and the density of shell material.…”
Section: Buoyancy Control In Buchicevas Bilobatummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such models were published by Moseley (1838), Trueman (1941), and later by Currie (1957); the latter two models were corrected by Heptonstall (1970), Reyment (1958Reyment ( , 1973, Mutvei and Reyment (1973), Westermann (1977), Saunders and Shapiro (1986), Tsujita andWestermann (1998), Westermann (1998b), Kröger (2000) and the latest much more complex calculations were done by Kröger (2002), Hammer and Bucher (2006) and Longridge et al (2009).…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, p. 360 ff). Trueman's (1941) and Currie's (1957) data were reevaluated by Heptonstall (1970) using modern estimates for cephalopod tissue and shell densities. Mainly the equations of Raup and Chamberlain (1967) were applied to buoyancy calculations with additional corrections and extrapolations for different shell parameters such as ribs introduced by Kröger (2002).…”
Section: Buoyancy Calculations For Ammonoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trueman (1941) noted that his equation and those of Moseley assume that the cross-section of the cone changes in a uniform manner, which is a deviation from true ammonite growth patterns. Heptonstall (1970) revised an oversight in Trueman’s equations and then calculated ammonite densities by using more accurate cephalopod shell densities (Trueman used the density of pure aragonite for the density of the shell, which led to notable error in the buoyancy calculations of both Trueman (1941) and Currie (1957). Further quantitative study of the volumetrics of the shell through mathematical methods and implications for the life habits of extinct ammonoids and nautiloids were the topics of numerous publications in the following decades; for comprehensive discussions of this topic, see Westermann (1996, 1999), Jacobs and Chamberlain (1996), Westermann and Tsujita (1999), and Ritterbush et al (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%