Wyłączenia gruntów rolnych z produkcji rolnej a dochody gmin z podatku od nieruchomości

Maćkiewicz, Barbara; Motek, Paweł

doi:10.14746/rrpr.2014.28.06

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Since the fees for the exclusion are quite high, in the case of excluding land from agricultural or forestry production for housing construction, designers create the border of the area to be excluded in such a way that the conditions contained in Article 12a Act [6] are fulfilled. This is also indicated by the authors [12][13][14]. As the authors [11] point out, "this border sometimes runs alongside or at a short distance from the walls of the building or other permanent elements of land development, e.g.…”

Section: Problems Of Determining the Range Of Land Usementioning

confidence: 63%

The Issue of Updating the Real Estate Cadastre in the Field of Land Use in Connection with the Construction of a Building

Karabin‐Zych

2021

GaEE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From the year 2014 to July 31, 2020, setting out a building was surveying work subject to the obligation to report to the locally competent district governor (starosta) before it was commenced. After completion of the building setting out, the contractor of surveying works was obliged to notify the authorities of the completion of the surveying works and to submit the results of surveying works connected with the building setting out. Since July 31, 2020, following the amended Geodesic and Cartographic Law, the obligation to report the building setting out has been repealed. Despite that, the real estate owner will still be obliged to submit an appropriate application to the starost to disclose the new land use in accordance with Article 22 of the Geodesic and Cartographic Law. The author has analysed 31 documentation sets, being the results of building setting out procedures. The analysis verified the size of a land parcel on which the buildings were set out, what land use was presented before setting out and what land use was presented after the building setting out. In addition, the current state of development of the land parcel (as of July 2020) was examined using map portals, and an orthophotomap was used to check whether the building was constructed, in order to verify whether the real estate cadastre was updated further.

show abstract

Section: Problems Of Determining the Range Of Land Usementioning

confidence: 63%

The Issue of Updating the Real Estate Cadastre in the Field of Land Use in Connection with the Construction of a Building

Karabin‐Zych

2021

GaEE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, they state [43] that many of the key amendments to the above-mentioned Acts [38,39], concerning conversion limits and fee increases, strengthen the protection of agriculture and forests. Nevertheless, according to Mackiewicz and Motek [44] and Świdzi ński [45], fees for land conversion, which, intentionally, according to the legislator's assumptions, should constitute an obstacle in the uncontrolled conversion of agricultural and forest land, supply the local budgets with additional amounts, which, unfortunately, could be not conducive to land protection. Among the reasons for the loss of agricultural land, the authors also mention the liberalization of legislation, e.g., [40,44,45].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, according to Mackiewicz and Motek [44] and Świdzi ński [45], fees for land conversion, which, intentionally, according to the legislator's assumptions, should constitute an obstacle in the uncontrolled conversion of agricultural and forest land, supply the local budgets with additional amounts, which, unfortunately, could be not conducive to land protection. Among the reasons for the loss of agricultural land, the authors also mention the liberalization of legislation, e.g., [40,44,45]. The amendment to the Act on the Protection of Agricultural and Forest Land of 2008 (1995) added a provision stating that restrictions on the use of land for non-agricultural purposes do not apply to agricultural land located within the administrative boundaries of cities, which significantly increased the conversion of agricultural land to urbanized areas [46].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Spatiotemporal Analysis of Land Take Exemplified by Poland

Elzbieta

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research was motivated by the growing interest of scientists and practitioners in land consumption. It was assumed that the multifaceted and space–time analysis of the dynamics of land use change reveals agricultural and forest land conversion into artificial areas, and thus highlight the regions of high human pressure. To fulfill the research objective, the proprietary coefficient of admissible (maximal) land take (aLT) was used. This study, based on open, publicly available spatial and statistical data, presents agricultural and forest land losses in four periods (2005, 2010, 2015, 2020) in Polish provinces. The analysis reveals both the value and the trend of land take and indicates Mazowieckie and Małopolska as the provinces of the highest land take pace since 2005. In contrast, provinces such as Zachodnio-Pomorskie and Opolskie, located in the northwest and southwest of Poland, are characterized by small and decreasing losses of agricultural and forest land, prompting them to be classified as lower outliers. The paper concludes, in part, that admissible (maximal) land take (aLT) is a useful tool for monitoring land conversion and planning spatial development of any region in the world.

show abstract

“…Przyczynia się to m.in. do nadmiernej i bezpowrotnej utraty gruntów rolnych, w tym także tych o wysokich klasach bonitacyjnych, rozwoju rozproszonego budownictwa mieszkaniowego, zatracania wiejskiego krajobrazu, jak również utrudnień w ustaleniu faktycznej powierzchni użytkowanych rolniczo gruntów, a w konsekwencji prawidłowego ich opodatkowania (Kacprzak, Maćkiewicz 2013;Maćkiewicz, Motek 2014;Maćkiewicz, Kacprzak 2015). Postępującemu zanikowi specyficznych cech krajobrazu wiejskiego sprzyja brak odrębnego aktu prawnego, który szczegółowo regulowałby kwestie związane z kształtowaniem terenów zieleni, a tym samym zieleni przydomowej.…”

Section: Wprowadzenieunclassified

Zagospodarowanie użytków rolnych na zabudowanych terenach mieszkaniowych aglomeracji poznańskiej

Lendínez

Maćkiewicz

Szczepańska

2017

FGSoE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Artykuł porusza kwestię sposobu zagospodarowania użytków rolnych pozostałych na zabudowanych terenach mieszkaniowych aglomeracji poznańskiej. Poprzez identyfikację zabudowanych działek budowlanych, na których zgodnie z zapisami ewidencji gruntów i budynków, nadal znajdują się fragmenty użytków rolnych oraz inwentaryzację faktycznego sposobu ich użytkowania wykazano, że grunty te w zdecydowanej większości nie są użytkowane rolniczo, a wykorzystywane przede wszystkim jako tzw. tereny zielone, tj. głównie trawniki i tereny rekreacyjne, którym towarzyszą obce gatunkowo nasadzenia. Potwierdzono tym samym powszechnie obserwowany zanik występowania tradycyjnego ogrodu wiejskiego.

show abstract

Wyłączenia gruntów rolnych z produkcji rolnej a dochody gmin z podatku od nieruchomości

Cited by 4 publications

References 1 publication

The Issue of Updating the Real Estate Cadastre in the Field of Land Use in Connection with the Construction of a Building

The Issue of Updating the Real Estate Cadastre in the Field of Land Use in Connection with the Construction of a Building

The Spatiotemporal Analysis of Land Take Exemplified by Poland

Zagospodarowanie użytków rolnych na zabudowanych terenach mieszkaniowych aglomeracji poznańskiej

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About