2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.123.169002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wu et al. Reply:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of our calculations are depicted by for uds-cc, by for udc-cs, by for usc-cd. The results of other theoretical predictions for udscc pentaquark are denoted by for the color-magnetic interaction based study [3], ♦ for the framework of the coupled channel unitary approach with the local hidden gauge formalism [21][22][23], for the quark model result [5].…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The result of our calculations are depicted by for uds-cc, by for udc-cs, by for usc-cd. The results of other theoretical predictions for udscc pentaquark are denoted by for the color-magnetic interaction based study [3], ♦ for the framework of the coupled channel unitary approach with the local hidden gauge formalism [21][22][23], for the quark model result [5].…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that recently the LHCb collaboration has observed a three peak structure [2] using an updated analysis. The pentaquark states, including the above hidden-charm pentaquark states, were theoretically studied using quark models [3][4][5], diquark models [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], hadronic molecular states [16][17][18][19][20], the coupledchannel unitary approach [21][22][23], the contact-range effective field theory [24], and the hadroquarkonia model [25]. For a review on the hidden-charm multiquark states, see [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sm, 169 Eu, 171 Gd, 173 Tb, 174 Tb, 175 Dy, 176 Dy, 177 Ho, 178 Ho, 179 Er, 180 Er 104 Rb, 113 Zr, 116 Nb, Tc, 125 Ru, 128 Rh, 130 Pd, 131 Pd, 140 Sn, 142 Sb, 145 Te, 146 I, 147 I, 149 Xe, 150 Xe, 157 La Ca, 60 Ca, 62 Sc, 59 K 28 Cl, 30 Cl , La, 156,157,158 Ce, 156,157,158,159,160,161 Pr, 162,163 Nd, 164,165 Pm, 166,167 Sm, 169 Eu, 171 Gd, 173,174 Tb, 175,176 Dy, 177,178 Ho, and 179,180 Er." However, Fukuda et al is only credited with the discovery of the 15 isotopes listed inTable 1as the others had previously been reported by Wu 19. Unfortunately, Fukuda et al did neither acknowledge nor reference the earlier paper.In the paper "Observation of new neutron-rich isotopes among fission fragments from in-flight fission of 345 MeV/nucleon 238 U: Search for new isotopes conducted concurrently with decay measurement campaigns" Shimizu et al reported the discovery of 17 new nuclides 12.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12) near the KK thresholds. An attempt to explain the decay η(1405) → f 0 (980)π 0 → π + π − π 0 invoking that mechanism was made in [126][127][128]. Shortly after that, we noted that in the calculations, the vector K * meson K * (892) was considered a stable particle in the intermediate state; we showed in [135] that taking its finite width Γ K * ≈ Γ K * →Kπ ≈ 50 MeV into account smoothes the logarithmic singularities in the amplitude and reduces the calculated probability of the decay η(1405) → f 0 (980)π 0 → π + π − π 0 by a factor of 6 to 8 compared to that with Γ K * = 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%