2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-95930-6_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WT Model & Applications in Loan Platform Customer Default Prediction Based on Decision Tree Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional data mining models also have the advantages of simple structure and quick decision-making (Galindo & Tamayo, 2000;Wang et al, 2007). Most credit default models are based on these models or are improved in different ways (Pang & Yuan, 2018). However, with the development of support vector machines and ensemble learning methods, the performance of traditional methods in credit default prediction is not as good as that of the expanded models and methods (Li et al, 2018;Qianmu, Yanjun, Jing et al, 2020;Sharif et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional data mining models also have the advantages of simple structure and quick decision-making (Galindo & Tamayo, 2000;Wang et al, 2007). Most credit default models are based on these models or are improved in different ways (Pang & Yuan, 2018). However, with the development of support vector machines and ensemble learning methods, the performance of traditional methods in credit default prediction is not as good as that of the expanded models and methods (Li et al, 2018;Qianmu, Yanjun, Jing et al, 2020;Sharif et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%