2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b04236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writing Theory and Modeling Papers for Langmuir: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some subfields now make working versions of codes available to readers (44), but this approach is unlikely to work in fields that use commercial or proprietary codes. Specific suggestions for enhancing the reproducibility of computational research, as well as ideas for making computational research more relevant to a broad community, have been discussed elsewhere (45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some subfields now make working versions of codes available to readers (44), but this approach is unlikely to work in fields that use commercial or proprietary codes. Specific suggestions for enhancing the reproducibility of computational research, as well as ideas for making computational research more relevant to a broad community, have been discussed elsewhere (45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that there are other well-written perspective articles, like Frenkel’s “Simulations: the dark side”, which is a must-read for experienced and beginner simulators alike . Another short perspective article from a few editors of Langmuir guides the readers on the qualities of a good theory or simulation paper/study from the perspective of the Langmuir readership. These articles from Frenkel and the Langmuir editors focus broadly on simulations in general, yet many of the guidelines listed in these perspectives are definitely applicable and useful for polymer simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%